CXRN vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. CXRN is actively managed, while UCO is passively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -25.61% vs 115.57% for UCO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

CXRN vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -16.09% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 139.34% return.

CXRN

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: -22.43%
• YTD: -16.09%
• 6M: -18.12%
• 1Y: -25.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: -3.93%
• 1M: -5.57%
• YTD: 139.34%
• 6M: 124.58%
• 1Y: 115.57%
• 3Y*: 24.38%
• 5Y*: 21.18%
• 10Y*: -11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXRN vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	-16.09%	-25.68%	7.40%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	139.34%	-29.75%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CXRN and UCO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024	0.13

Return for Risk

CXRN vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXRN

CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 2
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 0

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 54
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXRN vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXRN	UCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	2.03	-2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.83	2.39	-3.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.31	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	3.34	-4.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.82	6.32	-8.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXRN vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXRN and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXRN	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.71	2.03	-2.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.65	-0.34	-0.31

Drawdowns

CXRN vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -47.82%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXRN	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.82%	-99.95%	+52.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.83%	-34.77%	+7.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.82%	-99.26%	+51.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.13%	-85.49%	+55.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.07%	18.34%	-4.27%

Volatility

CXRN vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) is 15.47%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.99%. This indicates that CXRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXRN	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.47%	20.99%	-5.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.83%	46.57%	-19.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.45%	57.26%	-20.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.94%	59.81%	-22.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.94%	71.35%	-34.41%

CXRN vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CXRN and UCO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

CXRN vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	2.69%	3.30%	0.13%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CXRN and UCO in my portfolio?

CXRN and UCO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CXRN or UCO?

UCO has higher volatility (20.99%) compared to CXRN (15.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -47.82% vs UCO's -99.95%.

Which ETF is better, CXRN or UCO?

On 1-year performance, UCO leads with 115.57% vs -25.61% for CXRN. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, CXRN has been the lower-risk option at 15.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CXRN or UCO?

Over the 1-year period, UCO has performed better with a 115.57% return vs -25.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CXRN or UCO?

CXRN and UCO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CXRN or UCO?

CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between CXRN and UCO?

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.