CXRN vs. TAGS
CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index. CXRN is actively managed, while TAGS is passively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -7.33% vs 4.89% for TAGS. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for TAGS.
Performance
CXRN vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -13.17% return, which is significantly lower than TAGS's 7.86% return.
CXRN
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- 6M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -7.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.15%
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- -7.68%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- -0.46%
- ALL TIME*
- -4.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $59.75K | $98.55K | $292.18K | |
| $388.58K | $387.70K | $588.98K |
CXRN vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -13.17% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 7.86% | -8.76% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXRN and TAGS is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CXRN and TAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXRN vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank
CXRN
TAGS
CXRN vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXRN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.06 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 0.46 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 1.16 | -1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXRN vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -53.17%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and TAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXRN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.17% | -76.40% | +23.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.96% | -9.65% | -22.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.00% | -63.09% | +17.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -57.28% | +25.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.66% | 3.81% | +7.85% |
Volatility
CXRN vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 15.18% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) at 5.52%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXRN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.18% | 5.52% | +9.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.46% | 11.27% | +18.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.65% | 13.27% | +24.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.12% | 16.16% | +21.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.12% | 17.98% | +20.14% |
CXRN vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXRN vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.38% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXRN and TAGS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.18%) compared to TAGS (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -53.17% vs TAGS's -76.40%.
On 1-year performance, TAGS leads with 4.89% vs -7.33% for CXRN. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TAGS has performed better with a 4.89% return vs -7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while TAGS is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.21% for TAGS.
TAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXRN and TAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer