CX vs. SMSN.L
CX (CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.) and SMSN.L (Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd) are both stocks. CX operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials), while SMSN.L operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CX returned 8.18%/yr vs 29.18%/yr for SMSN.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CX vs. SMSN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than SMSN.L's 183.76% return. Over the past 10 years, CX has underperformed SMSN.L with an annualized return of 8.18%, while SMSN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 29.18% annualized return.
CX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 19.05%
- 1Y
- 90.98%
- 3Y*
- 27.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
SMSN.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 51.48%
- YTD
- 183.76%
- 6M
- 233.89%
- 1Y
- 469.41%
- 3Y*
- 64.80%
- 5Y*
- 28.31%
- 10Y*
- 29.18%
CX vs. SMSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 12.51% | 105.97% | -26.48% | 91.36% | -40.27% | 31.14% | 36.77% | -19.55% | -35.73% | -2.86% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 183.76% | 131.89% | -37.94% | 38.34% | -31.32% | -8.01% | 60.01% | 41.56% | -25.35% | 63.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CX and SMSN.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2001 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
CX:
$1.89B
SMSN.L:
$1.58T
CX:
$0.57
SMSN.L:
$320.04K
CX:
22.81
SMSN.L:
0.02
CX:
0.07
SMSN.L:
0.00
CX:
0.63
SMSN.L:
0.00
CX:
0.17
SMSN.L:
0.00
CX:
$16.57B
SMSN.L:
$389.99T
CX:
$5.51B
SMSN.L:
$152.35T
CX:
$1.63B
SMSN.L:
$68.67T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CX vs. SMSN.L — Risk / Return Rank
CX
SMSN.L
CX vs. SMSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CX | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | 9.42 | -6.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.36 | 6.63 | -3.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.86 | -0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 21.19 | -17.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | 71.55 | -57.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CX | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 9.42 | -6.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.82 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.89 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.53 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
CX vs. SMSN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than SMSN.L's maximum drawdown of -65.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and SMSN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CX | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -65.23% | -27.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | -21.96% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.38% | -44.52% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.05% | -49.78% | -13.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.70% | -54.44% | -29.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.17% | -0.93% | -37.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.18% | -18.07% | -33.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 6.52% | +0.10% |
Volatility
CX vs. SMSN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) is 13.21%, while Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a volatility of 21.91%. This indicates that CX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CX | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.21% | 21.91% | -8.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.69% | 41.66% | -12.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.12% | 49.44% | -14.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.79% | 34.33% | +5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.53% | 32.70% | +10.83% |
Dividends
CX vs. SMSN.L - Dividend Comparison
CX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than SMSN.L's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 0.49% | 1.40% | 2.88% | 1.79% | 2.50% | 1.85% | 3.60% | 2.47% | 3.65% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.71% |
Financials
CX vs. SMSN.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CX vs. SMSN.L - Profitability Comparison
CX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 4.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.
SMSN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.
CX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 452.69M and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
SMSN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.
CX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of 227.66M and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
SMSN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CX and SMSN.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CX and SMSN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer