CWS vs. SURE
CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) and SURE (AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SURE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWS returned 8.16%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for SURE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CWS charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SURE.
Performance
CWS vs. SURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWS achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than SURE's 11.70% return.
CWS
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SURE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 25.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
CWS vs. SURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | -1.80% | 6.43% | 9.82% | 25.06% | -10.42% | 22.20% | 17.12% | 30.97% | -6.46% | 20.92% |
SURE AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF | 11.70% | 10.58% | 12.17% | 23.30% | -11.24% | 23.87% | 8.76% | 28.89% | -17.03% | 13.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWS and SURE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.74 |
The correlation between CWS and SURE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWS vs. SURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWS
SURE
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
CWS
SURE
Industrials
CWS
SURE
Technology
CWS
SURE
Consumer Cyclical
CWS
SURE
Financial Services
CWS
SURE
Consumer Defensive
CWS
SURE
Utilities
CWS
SURE
Basic Materials
CWS
-
SURE
Communication Services
CWS
-
SURE
Energy
CWS
-
SURE
Real Estate
CWS
-
SURE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWS vs. SURE — Risk / Return Rank
CWS
SURE
CWS vs. SURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWS | SURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.34 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 3.58 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 13.28 | -13.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWS | SURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 1.98 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.78 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
CWS vs. SURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWS drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum SURE drawdown of -35.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWS and SURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWS | SURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -35.68% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -7.10% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.56% | -21.54% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -23.75% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -0.69% | -5.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -4.84% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 1.91% | +2.70% |
Volatility
CWS vs. SURE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) is 3.27%, while AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that CWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWS | SURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 3.79% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 9.40% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.28% | 12.85% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 17.14% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 17.58% | -0.67% |
CWS vs. SURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWS has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than SURE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWS vs. SURE - Dividend Comparison
CWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than SURE's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 0.31% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 2.07% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
SURE AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.68% | 1.11% | 1.72% | 1.08% | 1.28% | 1.09% | 1.26% | 0.65% | 1.14% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWS and SURE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SURE has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to CWS (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWS dropped -33.82% vs SURE's -35.68%.
On 5-year performance, SURE leads with 9.02% vs 8.16% for CWS. On fees, CWS is cheaper at 0.77% per year. On volatility, CWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SURE has performed better with a 9.02% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CWS is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SURE.
SURE has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.31% for CWS.
CWS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SURE is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for CWS and 0.90% for SURE.
SURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWS and SURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer