CWS vs. SGRT
CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWS charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
CWS vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWS achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
CWS
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWS vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | -1.80% | 0.00% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWS and SGRT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWS vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
CWS
SGRT
CWS vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWS | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWS | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 3.81 | -3.14 |
Drawdowns
CWS vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWS drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWS and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWS | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -17.87% | -15.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | 0.00% | -6.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -3.11% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | — | — |
Volatility
CWS vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWS | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.28% | 33.41% | -20.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 33.41% | -17.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 33.41% | -16.50% |
CWS vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWS has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWS vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
CWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 0.31% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 2.07% | 0.29% | 0.03% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWS and SGRT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for CWS.
CWS has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.77% for CWS and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for CWS and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer