PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWI vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWI vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CWI has underperformed DBAW with an annualized return of 9.91%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.


CWI

1D
-1.22%
1M
5.25%
YTD
13.91%
6M
16.33%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
9.91%

DBAW

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.28%
YTD
16.12%
6M
18.39%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWI vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
13.91%32.75%6.27%15.74%-15.39%8.81%9.83%21.92%-13.83%26.89%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.12%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CWI and DBAW is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2014

0.88

The correlation between CWI and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CWI vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CWI
DBAW

Financial Services

17.4%
24.1%

Technology

14.9%
18.7%

Industrials

7.8%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
7.9%

Healthcare

5.3%
7.2%

Energy

5.0%
5.3%

Basic Materials

4.4%
6.8%

Communication Services

3.2%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
5.3%

Utilities

1.2%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.5%

Financial Services

CWI
17.4%
DBAW
24.1%

Technology

CWI
14.9%
DBAW
18.7%

Industrials

CWI
7.8%
DBAW
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CWI
5.8%
DBAW
7.9%

Healthcare

CWI
5.3%
DBAW
7.2%

Energy

CWI
5.0%
DBAW
5.3%

Basic Materials

CWI
4.4%
DBAW
6.8%

Communication Services

CWI
3.2%
DBAW
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

CWI
2.8%
DBAW
5.3%

Utilities

CWI
1.2%
DBAW
3.2%

Real Estate

CWI
0.9%
DBAW
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWI vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWI
CWI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWI vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWIDBAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.55

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

4.09

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

16.97

-6.05

CWI vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWI and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWIDBAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.86

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.83

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.75

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.63

-0.38

Drawdowns

CWI vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and DBAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-31.44%

-29.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-9.00%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-14.11%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.45%

-17.87%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-31.44%

-3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.51%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-5.00%

-7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.16%

+0.79%

Volatility

CWI vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.71%. This indicates that CWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

4.71%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

11.00%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

12.88%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

13.74%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

15.28%

+1.85%

CWI vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWI vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than DBAW's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
2.70%2.97%2.89%2.80%3.17%2.65%2.07%3.05%2.81%2.29%2.45%2.62%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.29%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CWI and DBAW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CWI has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

On 10-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.44% vs 9.91% for CWI. On fees, CWI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CWI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.70% for CWI.

CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWI and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer