PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWI vs. ACWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWI vs. ACWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CWI having a 12.84% return and ACWX slightly higher at 12.88%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CWI having a 10.48% annualized return and ACWX not far behind at 10.06%.


CWI

1D
-3.07%
1M
1.17%
YTD
12.84%
6M
12.77%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
10.48%

ACWX

1D
-3.17%
1M
0.91%
YTD
12.88%
6M
12.78%
1Y
29.85%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWI vs. ACWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
12.84%32.75%6.27%15.74%-15.39%8.81%9.83%21.92%-13.83%26.89%
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
12.88%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CWI and ACWX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.98

The correlation between CWI and ACWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

CWI vs. ACWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CWI
ACWX

Financial Services

23.8%
23.7%

Technology

21.6%
23.8%

Industrials

14.4%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
7.0%

Healthcare

6.8%
6.5%

Basic Materials

6.6%
6.6%

Energy

5.1%
4.4%

Communication Services

5.0%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.0%

Utilities

2.8%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.3%

Financial Services

CWI
23.8%
ACWX
23.7%

Technology

CWI
21.6%
ACWX
23.8%

Industrials

CWI
14.4%
ACWX
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CWI
8.0%
ACWX
7.0%

Healthcare

CWI
6.8%
ACWX
6.5%

Basic Materials

CWI
6.6%
ACWX
6.6%

Energy

CWI
5.1%
ACWX
4.4%

Communication Services

CWI
5.0%
ACWX
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

CWI
5.0%
ACWX
5.0%

Utilities

CWI
2.8%
ACWX
2.9%

Real Estate

CWI
1.2%
ACWX
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWI vs. ACWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWI
CWI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWI vs. ACWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWIACWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.62

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

10.05

+0.07

CWI vs. ACWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the ACWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWI and ACWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWI vs. ACWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWX drawdown of -60.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and ACWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIACWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-60.40%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-11.42%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-13.84%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-29.78%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-35.38%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-3.17%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-13.30%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.98%

+0.01%

Volatility

CWI vs. ACWX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) have volatilities of 7.31% and 7.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIACWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

7.37%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

14.77%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

16.74%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

16.53%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

17.27%

-0.24%

CWI vs. ACWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWX's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWI vs. ACWX - Dividend Comparison

CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than ACWX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.54%2.82%2.97%2.96%2.68%2.74%1.88%3.22%2.60%2.40%2.77%2.51%
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
2.73%2.97%2.89%2.80%3.17%2.65%2.07%3.05%2.81%2.29%2.45%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, CWI and ACWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACWX has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to CWI (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs ACWX's -60.40%.

On 10-year performance, CWI leads with 10.48% vs 10.06% for ACWX. On fees, CWI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CWI has performed better with a 10.48% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CWI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

CWI has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 2.54% for ACWX.

Both ETFs track MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.32% for ACWX.

CWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWI and ACWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer