CWEB vs. FLCH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both China Equities funds - CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%) while FLCH tracks the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -40.57%/yr vs -4.34%/yr for FLCH. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

CWEB vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.10% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's -8.77% return.

CWEB

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: 11.42%
• 6M: -47.01%
• YTD: -40.10%
• 1Y: -40.81%
• 3Y*: -14.07%
• 5Y*: -40.57%
• 10Y*: —

FLCH

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.01%
• 6M: -13.50%
• YTD: -8.77%
• 1Y: -0.94%
• 3Y*: 8.69%
• 5Y*: -4.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWEB vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares	-40.10%	29.04%	0.12%	-32.85%	-59.43%	-79.35%	116.38%	51.24%	-63.01%	4.19%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-8.77%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CWEB and FLCH is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.92

The correlation between CWEB and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CWEB vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CWEB	FLCH
Communication Services	41.7%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	36.9%	20.0%
Healthcare	6.0%	5.7%
Real Estate	5.2%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	3.2%
Technology	4.0%	13.9%
Financial Services	2.3%	18.3%
Basic Materials	-	5.2%
Energy	-	3.3%
Industrials	-	11.1%
Utilities	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

CWEB vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWEB

CWEB Risk / Return Rank: 4
CWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 9
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWEB vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CWEB	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	-0.05	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	0.07	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.01	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	-0.04	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	-0.10	-0.97

CWEB vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWEB Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWEB and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CWEB vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWEB	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.18%	-62.09%	-36.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.36%	-21.48%	-47.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.36%	-25.43%	-43.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.46%	-52.77%	-41.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.56%	-35.69%	-61.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.85%	-30.60%	-35.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.43%	9.64%	+28.79%

Volatility

CWEB vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 17.07% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 5.89%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CWEB	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.07%	5.89%	+11.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.45%	13.69%	+26.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.88%	19.62%	+35.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.37%	29.59%	+64.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.41%	27.81%	+52.60%

CWEB vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CWEB vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than FLCH's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares	6.06%	2.77%	4.59%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%	1.59%	2.98%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.37%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWEB and FLCH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, CWEB and FLCH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CWEB or FLCH?

CWEB has higher volatility (17.07%) compared to FLCH (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.18% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which ETF is better, CWEB or FLCH?

On 5-year performance, FLCH leads with -4.34% vs -40.57% for CWEB. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CWEB or FLCH?

Over the 5-year period, FLCH has performed better with a -4.34% return vs -40.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CWEB or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CWEB or FLCH?

CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 2.37% for FLCH.

What is the main difference between CWEB and FLCH?

CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.19% for FLCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.