CW vs. MRSH
CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) and MRSH (Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc) are both stocks. CW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while MRSH operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CW returned 25.25%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for MRSH. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CW vs. MRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 38.43% return, which is significantly higher than MRSH's -9.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed MRSH with an annualized return of 25.25%, while MRSH has yielded a comparatively lower 11.56% annualized return.
CW
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 38.43%
- 6M
- 39.42%
- 1Y
- 61.45%
- 3Y*
- 63.27%
- 5Y*
- 43.89%
- 10Y*
- 25.25%
MRSH
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -10.36%
- 1Y
- -22.08%
- 3Y*
- -1.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
CW vs. MRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 38.43% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | -9.50% | -11.26% | 13.75% | 16.15% | -3.45% | 50.83% | 6.86% | 42.33% | -0.14% | 22.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and MRSH is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.31 |
The correlation between CW and MRSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CW:
$28.26B
MRSH:
$80.77B
CW:
$13.64
MRSH:
$7.99
CW:
55.91
MRSH:
20.80
CW:
3.05
MRSH:
2.43
CW:
7.92
MRSH:
2.97
CW:
10.74
MRSH:
5.46
CW:
$3.61B
MRSH:
$27.52B
CW:
$1.34B
MRSH:
$11.66B
CW:
$745.31M
MRSH:
$6.68B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CW vs. MRSH — Risk / Return Rank
CW
MRSH
CW vs. MRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CW | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.84 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.76 | -0.82 | +5.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.83 | -1.42 | +15.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CW vs. MRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, smaller than the maximum MRSH drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and MRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CW | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.19% | -67.46% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -27.01% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | -34.36% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -34.36% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.73% | -35.80% | -12.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -30.66% | +30.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -17.41% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 15.56% | -11.10% |
Volatility
CW vs. MRSH - Volatility Comparison
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) at 7.13%. This indicates that CW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CW | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.42% | 7.13% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.90% | 19.09% | +6.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.02% | 23.52% | +9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.89% | 20.21% | +7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.32% | 20.95% | +9.37% |
Dividends
CW vs. MRSH - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than MRSH's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | 2.17% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% |
Financials
CW vs. MRSH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CW vs. MRSH - Profitability Comparison
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
MRSH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 7.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
MRSH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
MRSH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CW and MRSH have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CW has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to MRSH (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs MRSH's -67.46%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CW and MRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer