CW vs. LDO.MI
CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) and LDO.MI (Leonardo S.p.A.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CW in Specialty Industrial Machinery, LDO.MI in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, CW returned 25.12%/yr vs 21.19%/yr for LDO.MI. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CW vs. LDO.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CW is traded in USD, while LDO.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LDO.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 37.55% return, which is significantly higher than LDO.MI's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed LDO.MI with an annualized return of 25.12%, while LDO.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 21.19% annualized return.
CW
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 37.55%
- 6M
- 38.99%
- 1Y
- 60.13%
- 3Y*
- 63.08%
- 5Y*
- 43.15%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
LDO.MI
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 11.60%
- 3Y*
- 77.52%
- 5Y*
- 49.45%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
CW vs. LDO.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 37.55% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
LDO.MI Leonardo S.p.A. | 7.11% | 116.42% | 65.70% | 93.63% | 22.66% | -1.81% | -36.54% | 35.08% | -25.06% | -14.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and LDO.MI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CW vs. LDO.MI — Risk / Return Rank
CW
LDO.MI
CW vs. LDO.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CW | LDO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.08 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.66 | 0.51 | +4.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 1.17 | +12.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CW vs. LDO.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, smaller than the maximum LDO.MI drawdown of -86.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and LDO.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CW | LDO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.19% | -86.89% | +27.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -22.61% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | -22.61% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -39.96% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.73% | -73.30% | +24.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.94% | +15.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -47.54% | +33.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 9.91% | -5.45% |
Volatility
CW vs. LDO.MI - Volatility Comparison
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) have volatilities of 10.40% and 9.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CW | LDO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.40% | 9.96% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.00% | 30.11% | -4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.95% | 41.29% | -8.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.89% | 36.75% | -8.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.31% | 38.71% | -8.40% |
Dividends
CW vs. LDO.MI - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than LDO.MI's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
LDO.MI Leonardo S.p.A. | 0.97% | 1.06% | 1.08% | 0.94% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 2.37% | 1.34% | 1.82% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CW vs. LDO.MI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Leonardo S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CW and LDO.MI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CW and LDO.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer