LDO.MI vs. AM.PA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) and Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA).

Performance

LDO.MI vs. AM.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) and Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LDO.MI vs. AM.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LDO.MI Leonardo S.p.A.	27.42%	91.71%	75.81%	87.64%	29.81%	6.60%	-42.19%	38.03%	-21.39%	-24.95%
AM.PA Dassault Aviation SA	22.64%	40.99%	11.84%	15.29%	69.25%	7.26%	-23.33%	-1.64%	-5.90%	23.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDO.MI achieves a 27.42% return, which is significantly higher than AM.PA's 22.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LDO.MI has outperformed AM.PA with an annualized return of 20.30%, while AM.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 14.02% annualized return.

LDO.MI

• 1D: 7.93%
• 1M: 7.59%
• YTD: 27.42%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 37.58%
• 3Y*: 81.74%
• 5Y*: 56.51%
• 10Y*: 20.30%

AM.PA

• 1D: 5.20%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 22.64%
• 6M: 17.49%
• 1Y: 11.22%
• 3Y*: 24.54%
• 5Y*: 30.41%
• 10Y*: 14.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LDO.MI vs. AM.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDO.MI

LDO.MI Risk / Return Rank: 68
LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LDO.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
LDO.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 62
LDO.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
LDO.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

AM.PA

AM.PA Risk / Return Rank: 54
AM.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
AM.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
AM.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 46
AM.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AM.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDO.MI vs. AM.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) and Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDO.MI	AM.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.34	+0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	0.68	+0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.09	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	1.13	+0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	1.95	+1.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LDO.MI vs. AM.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the AM.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDO.MI and AM.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDO.MI	AM.PA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	0.34	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.60	1.03	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.48	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.53	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between LDO.MI and AM.PA is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LDO.MI vs. AM.PA - Dividend Comparison

LDO.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than AM.PA's 1.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LDO.MI Leonardo S.p.A.	0.83%	1.06%	1.08%	0.94%	1.74%	0.00%	2.37%	1.34%	1.82%	1.41%	0.00%	0.00%
AM.PA Dassault Aviation SA	1.41%	1.72%	1.71%	1.67%	1.57%	1.29%	0.00%	1.81%	1.26%	0.93%	1.14%	0.87%

Drawdowns

LDO.MI vs. AM.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDO.MI drawdown since its inception was -90.12%, which is greater than AM.PA's maximum drawdown of -62.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDO.MI and AM.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDO.MI	AM.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.12%	-62.62%	-27.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.98%	-19.38%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.70%	-29.32%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.16%	-62.62%	-10.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-4.98%	+2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.07%	-15.52%	-37.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.10%	11.24%	-1.14%

Volatility

LDO.MI vs. AM.PA - Volatility Comparison

Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) has a higher volatility of 16.98% compared to Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA) at 15.37%. This indicates that LDO.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AM.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDO.MI	AM.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.98%	15.37%	+1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.79%	23.56%	+5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.40%	32.75%	+10.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.04%	28.98%	+6.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.54%	28.65%	+8.89%

Financials