PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDO.MI vs. SAABY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LDO.MI vs. SAABY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) and Saab AB (publ) (SAABY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LDO.MI is traded in EUR, while SAABY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SAABY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDO.MI achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than SAABY's 4.87% return.


LDO.MI

1D
-1.66%
1M
-4.07%
6M
-15.81%
YTD
2.75%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
64.97%
5Y*
52.70%
10Y*
19.29%
ALL TIME*
7.69%

SAABY

1D
0.72%
1M
12.64%
6M
-21.83%
YTD
4.87%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
61.05%
5Y*
53.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
41.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDO.MI vs. SAABY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
2.75%91.71%75.75%87.70%29.81%6.60%-14.67%
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
4.87%144.63%49.09%42.66%77.64%-44.96%62.97%

Correlation

The correlation between LDO.MI and SAABY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020

0.30

Over the past year, LDO.MI and SAABY have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDO.MI vs. SAABY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDO.MI
LDO.MI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SAABY
SAABY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SAABY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAABY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAABY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SAABY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAABY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDO.MI vs. SAABY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) and Saab AB (publ) (SAABY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDO.MISAABYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.05

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

0.12

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

0.26

-0.03

LDO.MI vs. SAABY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is comparable to the SAABY Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDO.MI and SAABY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDO.MI vs. SAABY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDO.MI drawdown since its inception was -84.17%, which is greater than SAABY's maximum drawdown of -51.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDO.MI and SAABY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDO.MISAABYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.17%

-51.44%

-32.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.45%

-35.52%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.45%

-35.52%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

-35.52%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.39%

-24.11%

+2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.18%

-16.43%

-21.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.29%

16.75%

-4.46%

Volatility

LDO.MI vs. SAABY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) is 12.85%, while Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) has a volatility of 16.72%. This indicates that LDO.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAABY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDO.MISAABYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.85%

16.72%

-3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.03%

33.14%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.30%

45.17%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.88%

47.58%

-11.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.44%

57.39%

-19.95%

Dividends

LDO.MI vs. SAABY - Dividend Comparison

LDO.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than SAABY's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
1.26%1.06%1.08%0.94%1.74%0.00%2.37%1.34%1.82%1.41%
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
0.40%0.36%0.73%0.84%1.24%2.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LDO.MI vs. SAABY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leonardo S.p.A. and Saab AB (publ). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LDO.MI values in EUR, SAABY values in SEK

Frequently Asked Questions


LDO.MI and SAABY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDO.MI and SAABY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer