CVV vs. SMR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Nuscale Power Corp (SMR).

Performance

CVV vs. SMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Nuscale Power Corp (SMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CVV vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CVV CVD Equipment Corporation	33.98%	-29.77%	-0.68%	-19.60%	33.41%	13.77%	-18.97%
SMR Nuscale Power Corp	-23.50%	-20.97%	444.98%	-67.93%	2.29%	-0.89%	1.71%

Fundamentals

EPS CVV : -$0.35 SMR : -$2.40
Total Revenue (TTM) CVV : $25.79M SMR : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) CVV : $7.29M SMR : $11.43M
EBITDA (TTM) CVV : -$843.00K SMR : -$673.69M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVV achieves a 33.98% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -23.50% return.

CVV

• 1D: -9.21%
• 1M: 16.62%
• YTD: 33.98%
• 6M: 23.21%
• 1Y: 34.85%
• 3Y*: -32.23%
• 5Y*: -1.34%
• 10Y*: -7.20%

SMR

• 1D: 5.76%
• 1M: -15.64%
• YTD: -23.50%
• 6M: -69.89%
• 1Y: -23.45%
• 3Y*: 6.04%
• 5Y*: 1.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CVV vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVV

CVV Risk / Return Rank: 60
CVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CVV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CVV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

SMR

SMR Risk / Return Rank: 35
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVV vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Nuscale Power Corp (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVV	SMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	-0.22	+0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	0.40	+1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.04	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	-0.34	+1.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.70	-0.61	+2.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVV vs. SMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVV Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the SMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVV and SMR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVV	SMR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	-0.22	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.02	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.02	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between CVV and SMR is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CVV vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CVV nor SMR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CVV vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVV drawdown since its inception was -89.52%, roughly equal to the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVV and SMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVV	SMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.52%	-87.47%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.04%	-80.82%	+39.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.44%	-87.47%	+4.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.42%	-79.71%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.40%	-33.44%	-20.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.30%	45.28%	-23.98%

Volatility

CVV vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison

CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a higher volatility of 53.99% compared to Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) at 16.44%. This indicates that CVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVV	SMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	53.99%	16.44%	+37.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	80.19%	72.55%	+7.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.32%	105.05%	-6.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.71%	90.95%	-16.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.53%	88.52%	-15.99%

Financials