PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVV vs. LW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CVV vs. LW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVV achieves a 129.77% return, which is significantly higher than LW's 8.99% return.


CVV

1D
-9.78%
1M
22.20%
YTD
129.77%
6M
138.26%
1Y
152.67%
3Y*
-4.77%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
-1.32%

LW

1D
2.75%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.99%
6M
9.23%
1Y
-14.53%
3Y*
-25.20%
5Y*
-9.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVV vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVV
CVD Equipment Corporation
129.77%-29.77%-0.68%-19.60%33.41%13.77%12.73%-9.30%-69.45%33.87%
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
8.99%-35.69%-37.01%22.32%42.89%-18.40%-7.23%18.27%31.81%51.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CVV and LW is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2016

0.09

The correlation between CVV and LW shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CVV:

-$0.70

LW:

$2.15

PS Ratio

CVV:

1.90

LW:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

CVV:

$19.31M

LW:

$6.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CVV:

$4.74M

LW:

$1.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

CVV:

-$3.15M

LW:

$893.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVV vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVV
CVV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

LW
LW Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LW Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVV vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVVLWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.98

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

-0.35

+4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

-0.60

+7.23

CVV vs. LW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the LW Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVV and LW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVV vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVV drawdown since its inception was -89.52%, which is greater than LW's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVV and LW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVVLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.52%

-64.56%

-24.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.04%

-41.37%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.53%

-64.56%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.44%

-64.56%

-18.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.98%

-58.30%

-4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.51%

-21.41%

-33.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.11%

24.39%

-1.28%

Volatility

CVV vs. LW - Volatility Comparison

CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a higher volatility of 25.37% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) at 8.88%. This indicates that CVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVVLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.37%

8.88%

+16.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.86%

38.62%

+51.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.21%

44.41%

+63.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.19%

37.90%

+40.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.88%

35.87%

+38.01%

Dividends

CVV vs. LW - Dividend Comparison

CVV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVV
CVD Equipment Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
3.34%3.53%2.15%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%

Financials

CVV vs. LW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVD Equipment Corporation and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.84M
1.56B
(CVV) Total Revenue
(LW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CVV vs. LW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CVD Equipment Corporation and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
8.0%
21.2%
Portfolio components
CVV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported a gross profit of 147.00K and revenue of 1.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.0%.

LW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.

CVV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported an operating income of -1.80M and revenue of 1.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -97.4%.

LW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

CVV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported a net income of -1.66M and revenue of 1.84M, resulting in a net margin of -90.2%.

LW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CVV and LW have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVV has higher volatility (25.37%) compared to LW (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVV dropped -89.52% vs LW's -64.56%.

CVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVV and LW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer