CVV vs. GPC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC).

Performance

CVV vs. GPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CVV vs. GPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CVV CVD Equipment Corporation	33.98%	-29.77%	-0.68%	-19.60%	33.41%	13.77%	12.73%	-9.30%	-69.45%	33.87%
GPC Genuine Parts Company	-13.21%	8.70%	-13.22%	-18.12%	26.82%	43.39%	-2.19%	14.05%	4.11%	2.45%

Fundamentals

EPS CVV : -$0.35 GPC : $0.47
PS Ratio CVV : 0.74 GPC : 0.61
Total Revenue (TTM) CVV : $25.79M GPC : $24.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) CVV : $7.29M GPC : $8.94B
EBITDA (TTM) CVV : -$843.00K GPC : $753.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVV achieves a 33.98% return, which is significantly higher than GPC's -13.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CVV has underperformed GPC with an annualized return of -7.20%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively higher 3.55% annualized return.

CVV

• 1D: -9.21%
• 1M: 16.62%
• YTD: 33.98%
• 6M: 23.21%
• 1Y: 34.85%
• 3Y*: -32.23%
• 5Y*: -1.34%
• 10Y*: -7.20%

GPC

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -10.52%
• YTD: -13.21%
• 6M: -22.39%
• 1Y: -8.30%
• 3Y*: -11.58%
• 5Y*: 0.82%
• 10Y*: 3.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CVV vs. GPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVV

CVV Risk / Return Rank: 60
CVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CVV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CVV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

GPC

GPC Risk / Return Rank: 30
GPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
GPC Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GPC Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVV vs. GPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVV	GPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	-0.28	+0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	-0.19	+1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.97	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	-0.22	+1.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.70	-0.72	+2.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVV vs. GPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVV Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the GPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVV and GPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVV	GPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	-0.28	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.03	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	0.13	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.38	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between CVV and GPC is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CVV vs. GPC - Dividend Comparison

CVV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVV CVD Equipment Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GPC Genuine Parts Company	3.93%	3.35%	3.43%	2.74%	2.06%	2.33%	3.15%	2.87%	3.00%	2.84%	2.75%	2.86%

Drawdowns

CVV vs. GPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVV drawdown since its inception was -89.52%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVV and GPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVV	GPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.52%	-54.89%	-34.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.04%	-34.84%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.44%	-43.40%	-40.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.54%	-54.89%	-29.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.42%	-37.90%	-40.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.40%	-10.17%	-44.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.30%	10.77%	+10.53%

Volatility

CVV vs. GPC - Volatility Comparison

CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a higher volatility of 53.99% compared to Genuine Parts Company (GPC) at 8.83%. This indicates that CVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVV	GPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	53.99%	8.83%	+45.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	80.19%	23.36%	+56.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.32%	29.91%	+68.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.71%	26.62%	+48.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.53%	27.93%	+44.60%

Financials

CVV vs. GPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CVD Equipment Corporation and Genuine Parts Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CVV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.10M and revenue of 4.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.

GPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a gross profit of 2.10B and revenue of 6.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.0%.

CVV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported an operating income of -1.35M and revenue of 4.95M, resulting in an operating margin of -27.2%.

GPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported an operating income of -38.43M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.

CVV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported a net income of -1.27M and revenue of 4.95M, resulting in a net margin of -25.6%.

GPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a net income of -609.50M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in a net margin of -10.1%.