CVV vs. GPC

In the year-to-date period, CVV achieves a -14.32% return, which is significantly lower than GPC's 0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CVV has underperformed GPC with an annualized return of -12.77%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively higher 4.87% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CVV Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is comparable to the GPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVV and GPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CVV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%.

The maximum CVV drawdown since its inception was -89.52%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVV and GPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a higher volatility of 31.86% compared to Genuine Parts Company (GPC) at 4.31%. This indicates that CVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVD Equipment Corporation and Genuine Parts Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.