CVV vs. GPC
CVV (CVD Equipment Corporation) and GPC (Genuine Parts Company) are both stocks. CVV operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while GPC operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CVV returned -2.08%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for GPC. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CVV vs. GPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVV achieves a 133.33% return, which is significantly higher than GPC's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CVV has underperformed GPC with an annualized return of -2.08%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively higher 5.20% annualized return.
CVV
- 1D
- 10.75%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- 6M
- 49.90%
- YTD
- 133.33%
- 1Y
- 96.46%
- 3Y*
- -3.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- -2.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.47%
GPC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 0.41%
- 3Y*
- -4.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $541.26K | $613.29K | $877.02K | |
| $222.96M | $262.69M | $201.67M |
CVV vs. GPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVV CVD Equipment Corporation | 133.33% | -29.77% | -0.68% | -19.60% | 33.41% | 13.77% | 12.73% | -9.30% | -69.45% | 33.87% |
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 3.18% | 8.70% | -13.22% | -18.12% | 26.82% | 43.39% | -2.19% | 14.05% | 4.11% | 2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVV and GPC is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1999 | 0.11 |
The correlation between CVV and GPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CVV:
$50.04M
GPC:
$17.15B
CVV:
-$0.79
GPC:
$0.24
CVV:
1.71
GPC:
0.69
CVV:
$19.31M
GPC:
$25.07B
CVV:
$4.74M
GPC:
$9.08B
CVV:
-$3.15M
GPC:
$736.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVV vs. GPC — Risk / Return Rank
CVV
GPC
CVV vs. GPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVV | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.03 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | -0.00 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | -0.00 | +3.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVV vs. GPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVV drawdown since its inception was -89.52%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVV and GPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVV | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.52% | -54.89% | -34.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.04% | -37.48% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.72% | -39.72% | -28.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.44% | -45.70% | -37.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.54% | -54.89% | -29.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.41% | -26.17% | -36.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.54% | -10.36% | -44.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.45% | 18.58% | +3.87% |
Volatility
CVV vs. GPC - Volatility Comparison
CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a higher volatility of 21.96% compared to Genuine Parts Company (GPC) at 15.75%. This indicates that CVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVV | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.96% | 15.75% | +6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 85.11% | 29.28% | +55.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.57% | 32.65% | +75.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.70% | 27.92% | +50.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.23% | 28.61% | +45.62% |
Dividends
CVV vs. GPC - Dividend Comparison
CVV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVV CVD Equipment Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 3.36% | 3.35% | 3.43% | 2.74% | 2.06% | 2.33% | 3.15% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 2.75% | 2.86% |
Financials
CVV vs. GPC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CVD Equipment Corporation and Genuine Parts Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CVV vs. GPC - Profitability Comparison
CVV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported a gross profit of 147.00K and revenue of 1.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.0%.
GPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a gross profit of 2.47B and revenue of 6.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
CVV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported an operating income of -1.80M and revenue of 1.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -97.4%.
GPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported an operating income of 336.34M and revenue of 6.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
CVV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported a net income of -1.66M and revenue of 1.84M, resulting in a net margin of -90.2%.
GPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a net income of 227.56M and revenue of 6.54B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CVV and GPC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVV has higher volatility (21.96%) compared to GPC (15.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVV dropped -89.52% vs GPC's -54.89%.
CVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVV and GPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer