CVSM vs. RYLD

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by CresAlta, while RYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. CVSM is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CVSM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

CVSM vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CVSM

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.18%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

RYLD

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: 9.10%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 21.81%
• 3Y*: 8.22%
• 5Y*: 3.17%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF	$30.96K	$58.28K	$38.43K
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	$8.91M	$8.95M	$8.86M

CVSM vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF	5.73%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CVSM and RYLD is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026	0.47

Return for Risk

CVSM vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVSM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVSM vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVSM	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.07	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.48	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.17	—

Drawdowns

CVSM vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVSM drawdown since its inception was -3.36%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVSM and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVSM	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-41.53%	+38.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.29%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.94%	-8.67%	+7.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CVSM	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.20%	10.61%	+0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.20%	13.97%	-2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.20%	17.05%	-5.85%

CVSM vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVSM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVSM vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

CVSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than RYLD's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.62%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVSM and RYLD in my portfolio?

CVSM and RYLD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CVSM or RYLD?

On fees, CVSM is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVSM or RYLD?

CVSM is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVSM or RYLD?

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.

What is the main difference between CVSM and RYLD?

CVSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RYLD is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CresAlta and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CVSM and 0.60% for RYLD.