CVRT vs. CANQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) and CANQ (Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos, while CANQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CVRT returned 76.22% vs 17.89% for CANQ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVRT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for CANQ.

Performance

CVRT vs. CANQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRT achieves a 40.89% return, which is significantly higher than CANQ's 7.60% return.

CVRT

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 8.71%
• YTD: 40.89%
• 6M: 41.79%
• 1Y: 76.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CANQ

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 5.52%
• 1Y: 17.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVRT vs. CANQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	40.89%	29.37%	13.51%
CANQ Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF	7.60%	11.69%	19.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CVRT and CANQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024	0.66

The correlation between CVRT and CANQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVRT vs. CANQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CVRT	CANQ
Technology	43.9%	-
Utilities	14.0%	-
Industrials	8.9%	-
Financial Services	8.2%	82.1%
Healthcare	7.4%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-
Energy	2.4%	-
Basic Materials	2.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

CVRT vs. CANQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVRT

CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CANQ

CANQ Risk / Return Rank: 42
CANQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CANQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CANQ Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CANQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CANQ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVRT vs. CANQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVRT	CANQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.57	1.67	+1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.32	2.37	+1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.30	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.91	1.67	+7.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.91	5.17	+29.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVRT vs. CANQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRT Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the CANQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRT and CANQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVRT	CANQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.57	1.67	+1.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.84	1.35	+0.49

Drawdowns

CVRT vs. CANQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRT drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, which is greater than CANQ's maximum drawdown of -12.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRT and CANQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVRT	CANQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.71%	-12.79%	-7.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-10.77%	+2.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-0.37%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-2.95%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	3.47%	-1.28%

Volatility

CVRT vs. CANQ - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) at 3.86%. This indicates that CVRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVRT	CANQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.64%	3.86%	+3.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.57%	7.52%	+10.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.47%	10.76%	+10.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	12.69%	+7.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	12.69%	+7.27%

CVRT vs. CANQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CANQ's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVRT vs. CANQ - Dividend Comparison

CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than CANQ's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CANQ Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF	4.36%	5.02%	4.19%	0.00%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	1.43%	1.68%	1.49%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVRT and CANQ in my portfolio?

CVRT and CANQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVRT or CANQ?

CVRT has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to CANQ (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRT dropped -20.71% vs CANQ's -12.79%.

Which ETF is better, CVRT or CANQ?

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 76.22% vs 17.89% for CANQ. On fees, CVRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CANQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVRT or CANQ?

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 76.22% return vs 17.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVRT or CANQ?

CVRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CANQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVRT or CANQ?

CANQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 1.43% for CVRT.

What is the main difference between CVRT and CANQ?

CVRT is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while CANQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CVRT and 0.90% for CANQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.