PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CANQ vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CANQ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CANQ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
-5.71%11.69%19.48%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
-5.93%20.77%20.00%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CANQ having a -5.71% return and QQQ slightly lower at -5.93%.


CANQ

1D
1.68%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-5.33%
1Y
9.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
3.39%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.93%
6M
-3.62%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CANQ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANQ has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CANQ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANQ
CANQ Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CANQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CANQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANQ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CANQQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.05

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.63

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.88

-0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.03

6.95

-3.92

CANQ vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CANQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANQ and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CANQQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.05

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.37

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between CANQ and QQQ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CANQ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CANQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
5.00%5.02%4.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Drawdowns

CANQ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANQ drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANQ and QQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CANQQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-82.97%

+70.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-12.62%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-8.98%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-32.99%

+30.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.41%

-0.21%

Volatility

CANQ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) is 3.72%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that CANQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CANQQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

6.51%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

12.77%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

22.67%

-11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

22.39%

-9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

22.25%

-9.52%