PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CANQ vs. AOA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CANQ and AOA is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

CANQ vs. AOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
13.71%
6.25%
CANQ
AOA

Key characteristics

Sortino Ratio

CANQ:

2.55

AOA:

2.46

Omega Ratio

CANQ:

1.33

AOA:

1.32

Ulcer Index

CANQ:

3.02%

AOA:

1.72%

Daily Std Dev

CANQ:

13.92%

AOA:

9.85%

Max Drawdown

CANQ:

-8.99%

AOA:

-28.38%

Current Drawdown

CANQ:

0.00%

AOA:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANQ achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than AOA's 4.15% return.


CANQ

YTD

4.97%

1M

4.79%

6M

13.71%

1Y

24.04%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AOA

YTD

4.15%

1M

3.54%

6M

6.26%

1Y

15.54%

5Y*

8.39%

10Y*

7.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CANQ vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANQ has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.


CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for CANQ: current value at 0.90% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.90%
Expense ratio chart for AOA: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CANQ vs. AOA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANQ

AOA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AOA is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AOA is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AOA is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AOA is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AOA is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AOA is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CANQ vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
The chart of Sortino ratio for CANQ, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.552.46
The chart of Omega ratio for CANQ, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.331.32
CANQ
AOA


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

CANQ vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison

CANQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than AOA's 2.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
4.60%4.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.21%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.02%2.15%2.18%

Drawdowns

CANQ vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANQ drawdown since its inception was -8.99%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANQ and AOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February00
CANQ
AOA

Volatility

CANQ vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) at 2.41%. This indicates that CANQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.96%
2.41%
CANQ
AOA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab