PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVRT vs. ICVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CVRT vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CVRT vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
9.28%29.37%13.23%11.02%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
3.58%18.10%10.61%8.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRT achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly higher than ICVT's 3.58% return.


CVRT

1D
3.84%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
9.28%
6M
15.65%
1Y
47.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICVT

1D
2.66%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
3.58%
6M
2.56%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVRT vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CVRT vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVRT
CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ICVT
ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVRT vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVRTICVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

1.71

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.33

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

3.10

+1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.03

10.57

+7.46

CVRT vs. ICVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ICVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRT and ICVT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVRTICVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.71

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.67

+0.66

Correlation

The correlation between CVRT and ICVT is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CVRT vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison

CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than ICVT's 1.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
1.59%1.68%1.49%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
1.62%1.73%2.19%1.85%1.93%7.70%3.98%1.86%4.82%2.56%3.06%1.57%

Drawdowns

CVRT vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRT drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, smaller than the maximum ICVT drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRT and ICVT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CVRTICVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.71%

-33.25%

+12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-7.55%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-3.67%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-9.64%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.21%

+0.42%

Volatility

CVRT vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) at 6.74%. This indicates that CVRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CVRTICVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.03%

6.74%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

11.65%

+6.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.00%

14.02%

+8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

13.20%

+6.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

15.54%

+4.12%