CANQ vs. BDGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).

CANQ and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CANQ is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Feb 13, 2024. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.

Performance

CANQ vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CANQ vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CANQ Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF	-5.71%	11.69%	19.48%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	-1.41%	10.61%	17.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANQ achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -1.41% return.

CANQ

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -4.76%
• YTD: -5.71%
• 6M: -5.33%
• 1Y: 9.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: -1.41%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CANQ vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANQ has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.

CANQ

Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF

BDGS

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

Return for Risk

CANQ vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANQ

CANQ Risk / Return Rank: 40
CANQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CANQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CANQ Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CANQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CANQ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 73
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANQ vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CANQ	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.99	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	1.67	-0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.28	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	1.80	-0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.03	9.34	-6.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CANQ vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CANQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANQ and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CANQ	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	0.99	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	1.51	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between CANQ and BDGS is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CANQ vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

CANQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CANQ Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF	5.00%	5.02%	4.19%	0.00%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.56%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%

Drawdowns

CANQ vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANQ drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANQ and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CANQ	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.79%	-9.12%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-5.85%	-4.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.26%	-2.15%	-7.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-0.67%	-2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	1.13%	+2.07%

Volatility

CANQ vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.39%. This indicates that CANQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CANQ	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	3.39%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.98%	5.09%	+2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.67%	10.70%	+0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.73%	8.35%	+4.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.73%	8.35%	+4.38%