PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVRT vs. FCVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVRT vs. FCVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRT achieves a 40.89% return, which is significantly higher than FCVT's 25.61% return.


CVRT

1D
-1.21%
1M
8.71%
YTD
40.89%
6M
41.79%
1Y
76.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FCVT

1D
-1.20%
1M
7.08%
YTD
25.61%
6M
25.00%
1Y
47.07%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVRT vs. FCVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
40.89%29.37%13.23%11.02%
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
25.61%19.60%11.92%10.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CVRT and FCVT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023

0.88

The correlation between CVRT and FCVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVRT vs. FCVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVRT
FCVT

Technology

43.9%

-

Utilities

14.0%
1.3%

Industrials

8.9%

-

Financial Services

8.2%
0.7%

Healthcare

7.4%
0.7%

Communication Services

3.4%

-

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Energy

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Technology

CVRT
43.9%
FCVT

-

Utilities

CVRT
14.0%
FCVT
1.3%

Industrials

CVRT
8.9%
FCVT

-

Financial Services

CVRT
8.2%
FCVT
0.7%

Healthcare

CVRT
7.4%
FCVT
0.7%

Communication Services

CVRT
3.4%
FCVT

-

Real Estate

CVRT
2.7%
FCVT

-

Energy

CVRT
2.4%
FCVT

-

Basic Materials

CVRT
2.1%
FCVT

-

Consumer Cyclical

CVRT
1.4%
FCVT
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

CVRT
0.8%
FCVT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVRT vs. FCVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVRT
CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FCVT
FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVRT vs. FCVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVRTFCVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.50

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.91

5.58

+3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.91

20.90

+14.01

CVRT vs. FCVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRT Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is comparable to the FCVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRT and FCVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVRTFCVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57

2.97

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.84

0.68

+1.16

Drawdowns

CVRT vs. FCVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRT drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, smaller than the maximum FCVT drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRT and FCVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVRTFCVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.71%

-31.79%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-8.47%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.20%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-10.36%

+7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.26%

-0.07%

Volatility

CVRT vs. FCVT - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) at 6.07%. This indicates that CVRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVRTFCVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

6.07%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.57%

12.99%

+4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

15.94%

+5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

14.09%

+5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

14.85%

+5.11%

CVRT vs. FCVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FCVT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVRT vs. FCVT - Dividend Comparison

CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than FCVT's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
1.43%1.68%1.49%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
1.19%1.98%1.30%1.76%3.71%23.07%1.72%1.60%1.85%2.18%1.88%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CVRT and FCVT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVRT has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to FCVT (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRT dropped -20.71% vs FCVT's -31.79%.

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 76.22% vs 47.07% for FCVT. On fees, CVRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FCVT has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 76.22% return vs 47.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.

CVRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.19% for FCVT.

CVRT is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while FCVT is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CVRT and 0.95% for FCVT.

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVRT and FCVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer