CVRT vs. FCVT
CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) and FCVT (First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos, while FCVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CVRT returned 76.22% vs 47.07% for FCVT. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CVRT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FCVT.
Performance
CVRT vs. FCVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVRT achieves a 40.89% return, which is significantly higher than FCVT's 25.61% return.
CVRT
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 40.89%
- 6M
- 41.79%
- 1Y
- 76.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCVT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- YTD
- 25.61%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 47.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
CVRT vs. FCVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF | 40.89% | 29.37% | 13.23% | 11.02% |
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 25.61% | 19.60% | 11.92% | 10.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVRT and FCVT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CVRT and FCVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
CVRT vs. FCVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVRT
FCVT
Technology
-
Utilities
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
CVRT
FCVT
-
Utilities
CVRT
FCVT
Industrials
CVRT
FCVT
-
Financial Services
CVRT
FCVT
Healthcare
CVRT
FCVT
Communication Services
CVRT
FCVT
-
Real Estate
CVRT
FCVT
-
Energy
CVRT
FCVT
-
Basic Materials
CVRT
FCVT
-
Consumer Cyclical
CVRT
FCVT
Consumer Defensive
CVRT
FCVT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVRT vs. FCVT — Risk / Return Rank
CVRT
FCVT
CVRT vs. FCVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVRT | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.50 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.91 | 5.58 | +3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.91 | 20.90 | +14.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVRT | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57 | 2.97 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.84 | 0.68 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
CVRT vs. FCVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVRT drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, smaller than the maximum FCVT drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRT and FCVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVRT | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.71% | -31.79% | +11.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.60% | -8.47% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -1.20% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -10.36% | +7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.26% | -0.07% |
Volatility
CVRT vs. FCVT - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) at 6.07%. This indicates that CVRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVRT | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 6.07% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.57% | 12.99% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.47% | 15.94% | +5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 14.09% | +5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 14.85% | +5.11% |
CVRT vs. FCVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FCVT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVRT vs. FCVT - Dividend Comparison
CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than FCVT's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF | 1.43% | 1.68% | 1.49% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 1.19% | 1.98% | 1.30% | 1.76% | 3.71% | 23.07% | 1.72% | 1.60% | 1.85% | 2.18% | 1.88% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CVRT and FCVT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CVRT has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to FCVT (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRT dropped -20.71% vs FCVT's -31.79%.
On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 76.22% vs 47.07% for FCVT. On fees, CVRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FCVT has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 76.22% return vs 47.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CVRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.
CVRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.19% for FCVT.
CVRT is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while FCVT is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CVRT and 0.95% for FCVT.
CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVRT and FCVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer