CVNA vs. CLS
CVNA (Carvana Co.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. CVNA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, CVNA returned 3.14%/yr vs 116.26%/yr for CLS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CVNA vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVNA achieves a -24.06% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 32.99% return.
CVNA
- 1D
- -5.49%
- 1M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -24.06%
- 6M
- -29.67%
- 1Y
- 0.49%
- 3Y*
- 138.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 200.71%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
CVNA vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVNA Carvana Co. | -24.06% | 107.52% | 284.13% | 1,016.88% | -97.96% | -3.24% | 160.23% | 181.41% | 71.08% | 41.63% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -27.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVNA and CLS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
CVNA:
$9.49B
CLS:
$45.48B
CVNA:
$8.69
CLS:
$8.28
CVNA:
7.37
CLS:
47.45
CVNA:
0.03
CLS:
0.64
CVNA:
0.47
CLS:
3.30
CVNA:
2.55
CLS:
21.68
CVNA:
$22.52B
CLS:
$13.81B
CVNA:
$4.50B
CLS:
$1.60B
CVNA:
-$116.00M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVNA vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
CVNA
CLS
CVNA vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carvana Co. (CVNA) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVNA | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.37 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 6.91 | -6.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 16.83 | -16.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVNA vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVNA drawdown since its inception was -98.99%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNA and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVNA | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.99% | -96.93% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.21% | -29.24% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.47% | -53.96% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.99% | -53.96% | -45.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.01% | -16.78% | -16.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -73.31% | +35.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.79% | 11.98% | +6.81% |
Volatility
CVNA vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Carvana Co. (CVNA) is 16.26%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.54%. This indicates that CVNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVNA | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.26% | 27.54% | -11.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.02% | 55.42% | -13.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.04% | 72.65% | -12.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.17% | 57.70% | +53.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.32% | 49.97% | +49.35% |
Dividends
CVNA vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CVNA nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CVNA vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carvana Co. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CVNA vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
CVNA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 6.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
CVNA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported an operating income of 581.00M and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
CVNA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carvana Co. reported a net income of 250.00M and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CVNA and CLS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to CVNA (16.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVNA dropped -98.99% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVNA and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer