PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVMC vs. IMCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVMC vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly higher than IMCB's 14.72% return.


CVMC

1D
-0.01%
1M
6.27%
YTD
15.51%
6M
15.72%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
10Y*

IMCB

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.22%
YTD
14.72%
6M
14.61%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVMC vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
15.51%9.52%12.57%4.40%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
14.72%10.25%15.10%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMC and IMCB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.98

The correlation between CVMC and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVMC vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVMC
IMCB

Technology

20.9%
21.3%

Industrials

20.6%
19.0%

Financial Services

13.1%
12.0%

Healthcare

10.1%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.0%

Real Estate

7.1%
4.3%

Utilities

6.0%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
5.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.6%
5.3%

Energy

1.1%
7.4%

Technology

CVMC
20.9%
IMCB
21.3%

Industrials

CVMC
20.6%
IMCB
19.0%

Financial Services

CVMC
13.1%
IMCB
12.0%

Healthcare

CVMC
10.1%
IMCB
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CVMC
10.0%
IMCB
9.0%

Real Estate

CVMC
7.1%
IMCB
4.3%

Utilities

CVMC
6.0%
IMCB
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

CVMC
5.5%
IMCB
5.1%

Communication Services

CVMC
2.9%
IMCB
2.3%

Basic Materials

CVMC
2.6%
IMCB
5.3%

Energy

CVMC
1.1%
IMCB
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVMC vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVMC
CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCB
IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVMC vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVMCIMCBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

1.83

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.61

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.90

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.15

11.50

-0.35

CVMC vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMC and IMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVMCIMCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.83

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.50

+0.27

Drawdowns

CVMC vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and IMCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVMCIMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-58.80%

+36.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-8.05%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.53%

-19.80%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.24%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-7.73%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.03%

+0.29%

Volatility

CVMC vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) at 3.31%. This indicates that CVMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVMCIMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.31%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

9.58%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

12.75%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

17.57%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

19.65%

-3.19%

CVMC vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CVMC vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than IMCB's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.17%1.39%1.21%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.21%1.42%1.43%1.55%1.70%1.08%1.12%1.32%1.80%1.31%1.79%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CVMC and IMCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVMC has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to IMCB (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs IMCB's -58.80%.

On 3-year performance, IMCB leads with 17.84% vs 16.44% for CVMC. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IMCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 16.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVMC.

IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.17% for CVMC.

CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.04% for IMCB.

CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVMC and IMCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer