PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLC vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVLC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.01% return.


CVLC

1D
0.32%
1M
6.11%
YTD
13.18%
6M
13.39%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
22.60%
5Y*
10Y*

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVLC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
13.18%16.13%24.20%17.14%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%16.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and VTI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.98

The correlation between CVLC and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVLC vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVLC
VTI

Technology

39.5%
33.5%

Financial Services

11.8%
12.0%

Industrials

9.9%
9.8%

Healthcare

9.1%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
10.0%

Communication Services

8.5%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.7%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.4%

Utilities

2.2%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.0%

Energy

0.5%
3.7%

Technology

CVLC
39.5%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

CVLC
11.8%
VTI
12.0%

Industrials

CVLC
9.9%
VTI
9.8%

Healthcare

CVLC
9.1%
VTI
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CVLC
8.7%
VTI
10.0%

Communication Services

CVLC
8.5%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

CVLC
4.6%
VTI
4.7%

Real Estate

CVLC
2.7%
VTI
2.4%

Utilities

CVLC
2.2%
VTI
2.3%

Basic Materials

CVLC
2.1%
VTI
2.0%

Energy

CVLC
0.5%
VTI
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVLC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLC
CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVLCVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.48

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

3.37

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.45

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.44

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.18

15.88

-0.70

CVLC vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVLCVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.48

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

0.51

+0.88

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLCVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-55.45%

+35.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-8.92%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-19.30%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-8.03%

+5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.93%

+0.16%

Volatility

CVLC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVLCVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

2.86%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

9.11%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

12.15%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

17.40%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

18.30%

-2.75%

CVLC vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CVLC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
0.89%1.02%1.03%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CVLC and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVLC has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 22.60% vs 22.37% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 22.60% return vs 22.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVLC.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.89% for CVLC.

CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.03% for VTI.

CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVLC and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer