CVLC vs. VTI
CVLC (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CVLC tracks the Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVLC returned 22.60%/yr vs 22.37%/yr for VTI. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
CVLC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.01% return.
CVLC
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 31.25%
- 3Y*
- 22.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
CVLC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 13.18% | 16.13% | 24.20% | 17.14% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 12.01% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 16.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVLC and VTI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between CVLC and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
CVLC vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVLC
VTI
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
CVLC
VTI
Financial Services
CVLC
VTI
Industrials
CVLC
VTI
Healthcare
CVLC
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
CVLC
VTI
Communication Services
CVLC
VTI
Consumer Defensive
CVLC
VTI
Real Estate
CVLC
VTI
Utilities
CVLC
VTI
Basic Materials
CVLC
VTI
Energy
CVLC
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVLC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
CVLC
VTI
CVLC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVLC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.48 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.46 | 3.37 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.44 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.18 | 15.88 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVLC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.48 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.51 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
CVLC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVLC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -55.45% | +35.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -8.92% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | -19.30% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -8.03% | +5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.93% | +0.16% |
Volatility
CVLC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVLC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 2.86% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 9.11% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 12.15% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 17.40% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 18.30% | -2.75% |
CVLC vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CVLC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 0.89% | 1.02% | 1.03% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, CVLC and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CVLC has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 22.60% vs 22.37% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 22.60% return vs 22.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVLC.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.89% for CVLC.
CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.03% for VTI.
CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVLC and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer