CVIE vs. EFAV
CVIE (Calvert International Responsible Index ETF) and EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - CVIE tracks the Calvert International Responsible Index while EFAV tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVIE returned 21.42%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for EFAV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CVIE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.
Performance
CVIE vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVIE achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 3.83% return.
CVIE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 22.19%
- 1Y
- 36.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.93%
CVIE vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVIE Calvert International Responsible Index ETF | 18.93% | 33.23% | 5.37% | 8.48% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.83% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 6.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVIE and EFAV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CVIE and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
CVIE vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVIE
EFAV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Financial Services
CVIE
EFAV
Technology
CVIE
EFAV
Industrials
CVIE
EFAV
Healthcare
CVIE
EFAV
Consumer Cyclical
CVIE
EFAV
Basic Materials
CVIE
EFAV
Consumer Defensive
CVIE
EFAV
Communication Services
CVIE
EFAV
Utilities
CVIE
EFAV
Real Estate
CVIE
EFAV
Energy
CVIE
EFAV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVIE vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank
CVIE
EFAV
CVIE vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVIE | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.17 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 1.46 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 4.10 | +7.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVIE | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 0.92 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.53 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
CVIE vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVIE drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVIE and EFAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVIE | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -27.56% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.71% | -6.46% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | -8.75% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -5.61% | +4.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -4.77% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 2.30% | +0.89% |
Volatility
CVIE vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison
Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.17%. This indicates that CVIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVIE | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 3.17% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 8.17% | +6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 10.35% | +6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 11.79% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 13.21% | +2.18% |
CVIE vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVIE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CVIE vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison
CVIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVIE Calvert International Responsible Index ETF | 2.22% | 2.85% | 2.78% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.08% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVIE and EFAV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVIE has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to EFAV (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVIE dropped -13.52% vs EFAV's -27.56%.
On 3-year performance, CVIE leads with 21.42% vs 12.87% for EFAV. On fees, CVIE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CVIE has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CVIE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.
EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.22% for CVIE.
CVIE tracks Calvert International Responsible Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CVIE and 0.20% for EFAV.
CVIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVIE and EFAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer