CUZ vs. SLG
CUZ (Cousins Properties Incorporated) and SLG (SL Green Realty Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Office industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, CUZ returned 2.62%/yr vs -2.18%/yr for SLG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CUZ vs. SLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUZ achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly higher than SLG's 9.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CUZ has outperformed SLG with an annualized return of 2.62%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively lower -2.18% annualized return.
CUZ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 7.47%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- -1.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.59%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
SLG
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- 14.56%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- -19.37%
- 3Y*
- 35.73%
- 5Y*
- -3.69%
- 10Y*
- -2.18%
CUZ vs. SLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUZ Cousins Properties Incorporated | 13.47% | -12.14% | 32.57% | 2.02% | -34.67% | 23.30% | -14.76% | 34.58% | -12.73% | 12.47% |
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 9.96% | -29.03% | 58.26% | 48.75% | -50.94% | 22.86% | -29.14% | 20.96% | -18.80% | -3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUZ and SLG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1997 | 0.60 |
The correlation between CUZ and SLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CUZ:
$4.74B
SLG:
$3.83B
CUZ:
$0.12
SLG:
-$2.05
CUZ:
6.42
SLG:
3.82
CUZ:
1.05
SLG:
1.16
CUZ:
$744.24M
SLG:
$993.51M
CUZ:
$398.94M
SLG:
$662.81M
CUZ:
$580.60M
SLG:
$547.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUZ vs. SLG — Risk / Return Rank
CUZ
SLG
CUZ vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUZ | SLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.94 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | -0.43 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | -0.72 | +0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUZ vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUZ drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, smaller than the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUZ and SLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUZ | SLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.87% | -94.02% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.39% | -45.40% | +18.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | -53.91% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.28% | -74.27% | +19.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | -77.70% | +23.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.60% | -37.04% | -14.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.46% | -27.45% | -8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.28% | 26.89% | -13.61% |
Volatility
CUZ vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is 7.08%, while SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that CUZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUZ | SLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 10.65% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.93% | 28.26% | -6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.96% | 38.00% | -12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.95% | 43.65% | -14.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.12% | 42.34% | -12.22% |
Dividends
CUZ vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison
CUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than SLG's 4.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUZ Cousins Properties Incorporated | 4.49% | 4.97% | 4.18% | 5.26% | 5.02% | 2.31% | 4.45% | 2.74% | 2.47% | 3.24% | 27.10% | 3.39% |
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 4.36% | 6.18% | 4.43% | 7.15% | 10.94% | 5.09% | 7.81% | 3.74% | 4.16% | 3.11% | 2.73% | 2.23% |
Financials
CUZ vs. SLG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cousins Properties Incorporated and SL Green Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CUZ vs. SLG - Profitability Comparison
CUZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 756.00K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 211.17M and revenue of 253.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.
CUZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 756.00K, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 188.38M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.4%.
CUZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported a net income of -186.00K and revenue of 756.00K, resulting in a net margin of -24.6%.
SLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -84.39M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in a net margin of -33.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CUZ and SLG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLG has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to CUZ (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUZ dropped -82.87% vs SLG's -94.02%.
CUZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CUZ and SLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer