SLG vs. EPR
SLG (SL Green Realty Corp.) and EPR (EPR Properties) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — SLG in REIT - Office, EPR in REIT - Specialty. Over the past 10 years, SLG returned -2.74%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for EPR. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SLG vs. EPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLG achieves a 18.80% return, which is significantly lower than EPR's 29.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SLG has underperformed EPR with an annualized return of -2.74%, while EPR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.23% annualized return.
SLG
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 21.69%
- YTD
- 18.80%
- 1Y
- -0.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- -0.86%
- 10Y*
- -2.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.92%
EPR
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 18.18%
- YTD
- 29.16%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- 3.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.74M | $40.64M | $39.39M | |
| $66.86M | $56.34M | $55.63M |
SLG vs. EPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 18.80% | -29.03% | 58.26% | 48.75% | -50.94% | 22.86% | -29.14% | 20.96% | -18.80% | -3.25% |
EPR EPR Properties | 29.16% | 20.52% | -1.25% | 38.83% | -14.61% | 50.60% | -52.09% | 17.13% | 3.59% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLG and EPR is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1997 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SLG and EPR has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
SLG:
$3.76B
EPR:
$4.75B
SLG:
-$2.29
EPR:
$3.43
SLG:
3.85
EPR:
6.52
SLG:
1.27
EPR:
2.07
SLG:
$1.04B
EPR:
$730.45M
SLG:
$530.86M
EPR:
$508.64M
SLG:
$492.41M
EPR:
$585.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLG vs. EPR — Risk / Return Rank
SLG
EPR
SLG vs. EPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and EPR Properties (EPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLG | EPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.18 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 1.05 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 2.70 | -2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLG vs. EPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLG drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than EPR's maximum drawdown of -82.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLG and EPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLG | EPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.02% | -82.02% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.40% | -19.51% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.91% | -19.51% | -34.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.27% | -35.63% | -38.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.70% | -82.02% | +4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.98% | -3.03% | -28.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.47% | -16.51% | -10.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.27% | 7.60% | +19.67% |
Volatility
SLG vs. EPR - Volatility Comparison
SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a higher volatility of 11.09% compared to EPR Properties (EPR) at 5.84%. This indicates that SLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLG | EPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.09% | 5.84% | +5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.37% | 16.52% | +12.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.11% | 22.85% | +15.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.68% | 25.62% | +18.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.39% | 42.48% | -0.09% |
Dividends
SLG vs. EPR - Dividend Comparison
SLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than EPR's 5.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPR EPR Properties | 5.82% | 7.05% | 7.68% | 6.81% | 8.62% | 3.16% | 4.66% | 6.37% | 5.62% | 6.23% | 5.35% | 6.21% |
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 4.28% | 6.18% | 4.43% | 7.15% | 10.94% | 5.09% | 7.81% | 3.74% | 4.16% | 3.11% | 2.73% | 2.23% |
Financials
SLG vs. EPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SL Green Realty Corp. and EPR Properties. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLG vs. EPR - Profitability Comparison
SLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 221.57M and revenue of 264.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.9%.
EPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EPR Properties reported a gross profit of 196.03M and revenue of 196.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
SLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 198.79M and revenue of 264.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.3%.
EPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EPR Properties reported an operating income of 107.04M and revenue of 196.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.6%.
SLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -26.50M and revenue of 264.00M, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.
EPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EPR Properties reported a net income of 67.17M and revenue of 196.08M, resulting in a net margin of 34.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLG and EPR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLG has higher volatility (11.09%) compared to EPR (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLG dropped -94.02% vs EPR's -82.02%.
EPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLG and EPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer