PortfoliosLab logo
SLG vs. BDN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SLG and BDN is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SLG vs. BDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SLG:

0.27

BDN:

-0.10

Sortino Ratio

SLG:

0.81

BDN:

0.25

Omega Ratio

SLG:

1.10

BDN:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

SLG:

0.36

BDN:

0.00

Martin Ratio

SLG:

0.92

BDN:

0.01

Ulcer Index

SLG:

16.31%

BDN:

18.52%

Daily Std Dev

SLG:

36.55%

BDN:

36.43%

Max Drawdown

SLG:

-94.02%

BDN:

-97.00%

Current Drawdown

SLG:

-28.37%

BDN:

-59.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLG:

$4.37B

BDN:

$735.50M

EPS

SLG:

-$0.42

BDN:

-$1.20

PEG Ratio

SLG:

0.95

BDN:

14.94

PS Ratio

SLG:

6.74

BDN:

2.35

PB Ratio

SLG:

1.11

BDN:

0.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLG:

$938.24M

BDN:

$500.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLG:

$521.83M

BDN:

$268.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

SLG:

$426.66M

BDN:

-$231.13M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLG achieves a -14.26% return, which is significantly higher than BDN's -20.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SLG has outperformed BDN with an annualized return of -2.56%, while BDN has yielded a comparatively lower -5.09% annualized return.


SLG

YTD

-14.26%

1M

11.69%

6M

-23.12%

1Y

9.65%

5Y*

16.44%

10Y*

-2.56%

BDN

YTD

-20.76%

1M

13.62%

6M

-14.99%

1Y

-3.57%

5Y*

-4.35%

10Y*

-5.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLG vs. BDN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLG is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLG is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLG is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLG is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLG is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLG is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BDN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDN is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDN is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDN is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDN is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDN is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDN is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SLG vs. BDN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the BDN Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLG and BDN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SLG vs. BDN - Dividend Comparison

SLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than BDN's 14.39% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
5.31%4.43%7.15%10.95%8.49%7.82%3.74%4.16%3.11%2.73%2.23%1.77%
BDN
Brandywine Realty Trust
14.39%10.71%13.33%12.36%5.66%6.38%4.83%5.59%3.52%3.76%4.39%3.75%

Drawdowns

SLG vs. BDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLG drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, roughly equal to the maximum BDN drawdown of -97.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLG and BDN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SLG vs. BDN - Volatility Comparison

SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) at 6.97%. This indicates that SLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SLG vs. BDN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SL Green Realty Corp. and Brandywine Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
239.85M
121.52M
(SLG) Total Revenue
(BDN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SLG vs. BDN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SL Green Realty Corp. and Brandywine Realty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
49.5%
60.8%
(SLG) Gross Margin
(BDN) Gross Margin
SLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 118.74M and revenue of 239.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

BDN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 73.93M and revenue of 121.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.8%.

SLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 49.01M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

BDN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brandywine Realty Trust reported an operating income of 15.16M and revenue of 121.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

SLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -15.18M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.

BDN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a net income of -27.40M and revenue of 121.52M, resulting in a net margin of -22.6%.