CUT vs. XME

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CUT (Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both Materials funds - CUT tracks the Beacon Global Timber Index while XME tracks the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CUT returned 3.95%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for XME. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CUT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.

Performance

CUT vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUT achieves a -4.74% return, which is significantly lower than XME's -1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CUT has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 3.95%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 15.22% annualized return.

CUT

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -0.70%
• 6M: -8.57%
• YTD: -4.74%
• 1Y: -8.82%
• 3Y*: -0.71%
• 5Y*: -3.71%
• 10Y*: 3.95%

XME

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -15.18%
• 6M: -15.17%
• YTD: -1.34%
• 1Y: 40.11%
• 3Y*: 26.30%
• 5Y*: 20.24%
• 10Y*: 15.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUT vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF	-4.74%	-5.92%	1.82%	8.65%	-16.38%	12.29%	18.05%	23.35%	-21.70%	30.41%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	-1.34%	83.47%	-4.54%	21.51%	13.13%	34.92%	15.95%	14.69%	-26.78%	21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CUT and XME is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2007	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between CUT and XME has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CUT vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CUT	XME
Consumer Cyclical	45.0%	-
Basic Materials	41.3%	74.8%
Real Estate	10.1%	-
Industrials	3.6%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	0.6%
Technology	0.1%	2.2%
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	24.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CUT vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUT

CUT Risk / Return Rank: 5
CUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CUT Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 38
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 37
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUT vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CUT	XME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	1.12	-1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.57	1.61	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.20	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	1.74	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.88	3.87	-4.75

CUT vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUT Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the XME Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUT and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CUT vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUT drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUT and XME.

Drawdown Indicators

	CUT	XME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.03%	-85.89%	+15.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.62%	-23.20%	+3.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.23%	-30.47%	+8.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.40%	-37.27%	+6.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.76%	-61.69%	+15.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.31%	-23.09%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.30%	-43.99%	+28.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.10%	10.39%	-0.29%

Volatility

CUT vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) is 5.71%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that CUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CUT	XME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	9.43%	-3.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.70%	28.05%	-13.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.75%	36.18%	-17.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.57%	32.71%	-14.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.05%	32.84%	-12.79%

CUT vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CUT vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than XME's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF	2.58%	2.46%	3.05%	2.44%	2.58%	1.57%	1.65%	2.67%	3.43%	1.57%	2.08%	1.52%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.36%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CUT and XME in my portfolio?

CUT and XME have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CUT or XME?

XME has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to CUT (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUT dropped -70.03% vs XME's -85.89%.

Which ETF is better, CUT or XME?

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 15.22% vs 3.95% for CUT. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CUT has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CUT or XME?

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 15.22% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CUT or XME?

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CUT or XME?

CUT has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.36% for XME.

What is the main difference between CUT and XME?

CUT tracks Beacon Global Timber Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CUT and 0.35% for XME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.