CUT vs. GOEX
CUT (Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF) and GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CUT is a Materials fund tracking the Beacon Global Timber Index, while GOEX is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CUT returned 4.69%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for GOEX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CUT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOEX.
Performance
CUT vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUT achieves a -4.36% return, which is significantly higher than GOEX's -6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CUT has underperformed GOEX with an annualized return of 4.69%, while GOEX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.
CUT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- -4.36%
- 6M
- -3.02%
- 1Y
- -4.86%
- 3Y*
- 1.55%
- 5Y*
- -3.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
GOEX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 6M
- -11.26%
- 1Y
- 67.83%
- 3Y*
- 49.11%
- 5Y*
- 20.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
CUT vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | -4.36% | -5.92% | 1.82% | 8.65% | -16.38% | 12.29% | 18.05% | 23.35% | -21.70% | 30.41% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -6.42% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUT and GOEX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2010 | 0.27 |
CUT vs. GOEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CUT
GOEX
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
CUT
GOEX
Consumer Cyclical
CUT
GOEX
-
Industrials
CUT
GOEX
Real Estate
CUT
GOEX
-
Financial Services
CUT
GOEX
-
Consumer Defensive
CUT
GOEX
-
Technology
CUT
GOEX
-
Communication Services
CUT
-
GOEX
-
Energy
CUT
-
GOEX
-
Healthcare
CUT
-
GOEX
-
Utilities
CUT
-
GOEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUT vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank
CUT
GOEX
CUT vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUT | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.24 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 1.72 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 4.61 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUT vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUT drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, smaller than the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUT and GOEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUT | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.03% | -88.83% | +18.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.62% | -39.64% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.23% | -39.64% | +17.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.40% | -47.16% | +16.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.76% | -53.66% | +7.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.00% | -30.93% | +8.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -63.48% | +48.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.50% | 14.77% | -5.27% |
Volatility
CUT vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) is 4.94%, while Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a volatility of 17.87%. This indicates that CUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUT | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 17.87% | -12.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 42.43% | -28.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.86% | 51.38% | -32.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 39.52% | -21.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 40.19% | -19.98% |
CUT vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CUT vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison
CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than GOEX's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | 2.57% | 2.46% | 3.05% | 2.44% | 2.58% | 1.57% | 1.65% | 2.67% | 3.43% | 1.57% | 2.08% | 1.52% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.22% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CUT and GOEX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (17.87%) compared to CUT (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUT dropped -70.03% vs GOEX's -88.83%.
On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 12.52% vs 4.69% for CUT. On fees, CUT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, CUT has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CUT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.
CUT has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.22% for GOEX.
CUT is categorized as Materials, while GOEX is Gold. CUT tracks Beacon Global Timber Index, while GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CUT and 0.65% for GOEX.
GOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CUT and GOEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer