CUT vs. SPY
CUT (Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CUT is a Materials fund tracking the Beacon Global Timber Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CUT returned 4.57%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for SPY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CUT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
CUT vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUT achieves a -5.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CUT has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 4.57%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.
CUT
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- -5.45%
- 6M
- -4.37%
- 1Y
- -6.01%
- 3Y*
- 1.17%
- 5Y*
- -3.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.57%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
CUT vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | -5.45% | -5.92% | 1.82% | 8.65% | -16.38% | 12.29% | 18.05% | 23.35% | -21.70% | 30.41% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.10% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUT and SPY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2007 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CUT and SPY has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CUT vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CUT
SPY
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
CUT
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
CUT
SPY
Industrials
CUT
SPY
Real Estate
CUT
SPY
Financial Services
CUT
SPY
Consumer Defensive
CUT
SPY
Technology
CUT
SPY
Communication Services
CUT
-
SPY
Energy
CUT
-
SPY
Healthcare
CUT
-
SPY
Utilities
CUT
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUT vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
CUT
SPY
CUT vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.51 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 11.15 | -11.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUT vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUT drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUT and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.03% | -55.19% | -14.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.62% | -8.88% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.23% | -18.76% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.40% | -24.50% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.76% | -33.72% | -12.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.89% | -3.22% | -19.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -9.03% | -6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.55% | 1.99% | +7.56% |
Volatility
CUT vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 5.08% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.85% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 9.81% | +4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.86% | 12.47% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 17.15% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 17.95% | +2.17% |
CUT vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CUT vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | 2.60% | 2.46% | 3.05% | 2.44% | 2.58% | 1.57% | 1.65% | 2.67% | 3.43% | 1.57% | 2.08% | 1.52% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CUT and SPY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CUT has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to SPY (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUT dropped -70.03% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 4.57% for CUT. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CUT.
CUT has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
CUT is categorized as Materials, while SPY is S&P 500. CUT tracks Beacon Global Timber Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CUT and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CUT and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer