CUT vs. SPY
CUT (Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CUT is a Materials fund tracking the Beacon Global Timber Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CUT returned 3.93%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CUT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
CUT vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUT achieves a -5.58% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CUT has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 3.93%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
CUT
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- -5.58%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- -7.17%
- 3Y*
- 0.54%
- 5Y*
- -4.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.93%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
CUT vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | -5.58% | -5.92% | 1.82% | 8.65% | -16.38% | 12.29% | 18.05% | 23.35% | -21.70% | 30.41% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUT and SPY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2007 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CUT and SPY has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CUT vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CUT
SPY
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
CUT
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
CUT
SPY
Industrials
CUT
SPY
Real Estate
CUT
SPY
Consumer Defensive
CUT
SPY
Financial Services
CUT
SPY
Technology
CUT
SPY
Communication Services
CUT
-
SPY
Energy
CUT
-
SPY
Healthcare
CUT
-
SPY
Utilities
CUT
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUT vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
CUT
SPY
CUT vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CUT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.43 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 3.16 | -3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 14.72 | -15.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CUT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 2.38 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.82 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.87 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.59 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
CUT vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUT drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUT and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.03% | -55.19% | -14.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.62% | -8.88% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.23% | -18.76% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.40% | -24.50% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.76% | -33.72% | -12.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.99% | -0.70% | -22.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.26% | -9.05% | -6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.88% | 1.91% | +6.97% |
Volatility
CUT vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that CUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 2.84% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.05% | 8.90% | +5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 11.83% | +6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 17.05% | +1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 17.94% | +2.28% |
CUT vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CUT vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | 2.61% | 2.46% | 3.05% | 2.44% | 2.58% | 1.57% | 1.65% | 2.67% | 3.43% | 1.57% | 2.08% | 1.52% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CUT and SPY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CUT has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUT dropped -70.03% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 3.93% for CUT. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CUT.
CUT has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
CUT is categorized as Materials, while SPY is S&P 500. CUT tracks Beacon Global Timber Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CUT and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CUT and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer