CUT vs. XLB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB).
CUT and XLB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CUT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Beacon Global Timber Index. It was launched on Nov 9, 2007. XLB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Materials Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both CUT and XLB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CUT vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CUT vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | -1.41% | -5.92% | 1.82% | 8.65% | -16.38% | 12.29% | 18.05% | 23.35% | -21.70% | 30.41% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 10.68% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUT achieves a -1.41% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 10.68% return. Over the past 10 years, CUT has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 4.66%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.
CUT
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -9.49%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- 1Y
- -4.47%
- 3Y*
- 1.30%
- 5Y*
- -2.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
XLB
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 10.68%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 18.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CUT vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CUT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CUT vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
CUT
XLB
CUT vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CUT | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | 0.89 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | 1.38 | -1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.18 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 1.35 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 4.72 | -5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CUT | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 0.89 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.36 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.51 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.36 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CUT and XLB is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CUT vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than XLB's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | 2.50% | 2.46% | 3.05% | 2.44% | 2.58% | 1.57% | 1.65% | 2.67% | 3.43% | 1.57% | 2.08% | 1.52% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.75% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Drawdowns
CUT vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUT drawdown since its inception was -70.03%, which is greater than XLB's maximum drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUT and XLB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUT | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.03% | -59.83% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.98% | -14.64% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.21% | -24.72% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.76% | -37.27% | -8.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.60% | -6.39% | -13.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.20% | -10.88% | -4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 4.20% | +2.48% |
Volatility
CUT vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 6.28%. This indicates that CUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CUT | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 6.28% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.02% | 12.53% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.97% | 20.95% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 18.91% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 20.62% | -0.43% |