CUBI vs. ICE
CUBI (Customers Bancorp, Inc.) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CUBI in Banks - Regional, ICE in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges. Over the past 10 years, CUBI returned 12.10%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for ICE. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CUBI vs. ICE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUBI achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than ICE's -5.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CUBI having a 12.10% annualized return and ICE not far ahead at 12.62%.
CUBI
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 24.83%
- 5Y*
- 16.88%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.47%
ICE
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- 14.66%
- 6M
- -11.65%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 1Y
- -16.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22.20M | $23.46M | $25.06M | |
| $688.42M | $623.20M | $636.51M |
CUBI vs. ICE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUBI Customers Bancorp, Inc. | 8.07% | 50.21% | -15.52% | 103.32% | -56.65% | 259.57% | -23.65% | 30.82% | -29.97% | -27.44% |
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | -5.20% | 9.92% | 17.46% | 27.12% | -23.91% | 19.94% | 26.15% | 24.47% | 8.11% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUBI and ICE is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2012 | 0.25 |
The correlation between CUBI and ICE shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CUBI:
$2.66B
ICE:
$85.99B
CUBI:
$11.19
ICE:
$7.06
CUBI:
7.03
ICE:
21.59
CUBI:
1.41
ICE:
6.48
CUBI:
$1.46B
ICE:
$13.42B
CUBI:
$439.08M
ICE:
$10.01B
CUBI:
$565.58M
ICE:
$6.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUBI vs. ICE — Risk / Return Rank
CUBI
ICE
CUBI vs. ICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Customers Bancorp, Inc. (CUBI) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUBI | ICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.90 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | -0.49 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | -0.99 | +3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUBI vs. ICE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUBI drawdown since its inception was -78.56%, which is greater than ICE's maximum drawdown of -73.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUBI and ICE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUBI | ICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.56% | -73.94% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.31% | -33.94% | +13.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.05% | -33.94% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.56% | -34.32% | -44.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.56% | -34.32% | -44.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -18.05% | +15.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.15% | -16.52% | -8.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.23% | 16.71% | -8.48% |
Volatility
CUBI vs. ICE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Customers Bancorp, Inc. (CUBI) is 6.99%, while Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that CUBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUBI | ICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 7.90% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.31% | 20.61% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.15% | 24.53% | +7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.67% | 21.65% | +30.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.11% | 22.42% | +26.69% |
Dividends
CUBI vs. ICE - Dividend Comparison
CUBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than ICE's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUBI Customers Bancorp, Inc. | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 1.31% | 1.19% | 1.21% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 1.13% |
Financials
CUBI vs. ICE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Customers Bancorp, Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CUBI vs. ICE - Profitability Comparison
CUBI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Customers Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of -201.56M and revenue of 311.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -64.8%.
ICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.82B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.
CUBI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Customers Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of -90.31M and revenue of 311.08M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.0%.
ICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.5%.
CUBI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Customers Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 71.56M and revenue of 311.08M, resulting in a net margin of 23.0%.
ICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 958.00M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CUBI and ICE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICE has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to CUBI (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUBI dropped -78.56% vs ICE's -73.94%.
CUBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CUBI and ICE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer