CTRZX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
CTRZX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jan 3, 2017. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
CTRZX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CTRZX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTRZX Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund | -0.65% | 7.48% | 2.03% | 5.78% | -14.46% | -0.95% | 8.47% | 9.07% | -0.96% | 3.79% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 14.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTRZX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return.
CTRZX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CTRZX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTRZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CTRZX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
CTRZX
FASGX
CTRZX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTRZX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 1.21 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.73 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.26 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.55 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.93 | 6.89 | -1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTRZX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.21 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.53 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.60 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CTRZX and FASGX is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CTRZX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
CTRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTRZX Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund | 4.08% | 4.39% | 4.61% | 3.47% | 2.70% | 2.13% | 4.69% | 3.32% | 2.89% | 2.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
CTRZX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTRZX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRZX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTRZX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.33% | -47.35% | +28.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -9.07% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.33% | -23.54% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -7.95% | +5.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -6.74% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 2.04% | -1.02% |
Volatility
CTRZX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) is 1.68%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that CTRZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CTRZX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 4.57% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 7.78% | -5.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 12.82% | -8.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 12.14% | -6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 12.56% | -7.44% |