PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTRZX vs. ARINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTRZX vs. ARINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRZX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than ARINX's 0.64% return.


CTRZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.36%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*

ARINX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.64%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTRZX vs. ARINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTRZX
Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund
0.41%7.48%2.03%5.78%-14.46%-0.95%8.47%9.07%-0.96%3.79%
ARINX
Archer Income Fund
0.64%4.42%4.90%3.99%-6.84%1.52%4.29%6.19%0.35%2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CTRZX and ARINX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.72

The correlation between CTRZX and ARINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTRZX vs. ARINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTRZX
CTRZX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CTRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CTRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ARINX
ARINX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ARINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ARINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTRZX vs. ARINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTRZXARINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

2.29

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

3.46

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.61

-0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

9.10

-3.45

CTRZX vs. ARINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTRZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the ARINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRZX and ARINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTRZXARINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.29

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.67

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.54

-0.15

Drawdowns

CTRZX vs. ARINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRZX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, which is greater than ARINX's maximum drawdown of -9.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRZX and ARINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTRZXARINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-9.38%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-1.57%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.14%

-1.57%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

-9.38%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-0.57%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-1.73%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.45%

+0.56%

Volatility

CTRZX vs. ARINX - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund (CTRZX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Archer Income Fund (ARINX) at 0.80%. This indicates that CTRZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTRZXARINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

0.80%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

1.46%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

1.79%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

2.06%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.11%

1.97%

+3.14%

CTRZX vs. ARINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTRZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ARINX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTRZX vs. ARINX - Dividend Comparison

CTRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than ARINX's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARINX
Archer Income Fund
3.58%2.72%3.77%3.15%2.72%2.56%2.66%2.69%2.84%2.94%2.84%2.79%
CTRZX
Multi-Manager Total Return Bond Strategies Fund
4.40%4.39%4.61%3.47%2.70%2.13%4.69%3.32%2.89%2.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTRZX and ARINX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTRZX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to ARINX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTRZX dropped -19.33% vs ARINX's -9.38%.

ARINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTRZX and ARINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer