CTAP vs. BUCK
CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CTAP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
CTAP vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 2.36% return.
CTAP
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 7.96% | 2.22% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 2.36% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAP and BUCK is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAP vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BUCK
CTAP vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTAP | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.55 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 38.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTAP vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAP | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -5.43% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.43% | -0.09% | -15.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -0.48% | -3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility
CTAP vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAP | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.47% | 2.80% | +21.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 3.44% | +21.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 3.44% | +21.03% |
CTAP vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTAP vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than BUCK's 7.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.29% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAP and BUCK have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.
BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.29%, compared with 1.84% for CTAP.
CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BUCK is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for CTAP and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer