PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTAP vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTAP vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 21.95% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.90% return.


CTAP

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
21.95%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTAP vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CTAP and BUCK is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

-0.04

CTAP vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CTAP
BUCK

Financial Services

49.3%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

CTAP
49.3%
BUCK
100.0%

Basic Materials

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Communication Services

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Energy

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Healthcare

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Industrials

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Real Estate

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Technology

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Utilities

CTAP

-

BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTAP vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTAP

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTAP vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CTAP vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTAPBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.50

1.47

+1.03

Drawdowns

CTAP vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTAPBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-5.43%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-0.04%

-4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-0.49%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

CTAP vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTAPBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.94%

3.14%

+20.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.94%

3.49%

+20.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.94%

3.49%

+20.45%

CTAP vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTAP vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
CTAP
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTAP and BUCK have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.42%, compared with 0.65% for CTAP.

CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BUCK is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.35% for BUCK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTAP and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer