CSTM vs. TYG
CSTM (Constellium SE) is a stock, while TYG (Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund) is MLPs fund actively managed by Tortoise. Over the past 10 years, CSTM returned 22.30%/yr vs -1.19%/yr for TYG. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSTM vs. TYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSTM achieves a 90.24% return, which is significantly higher than TYG's 12.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CSTM has outperformed TYG with an annualized return of 22.30%, while TYG has yielded a comparatively lower -1.19% annualized return.
CSTM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 16.28%
- YTD
- 90.24%
- 6M
- 99.44%
- 1Y
- 182.81%
- 3Y*
- 31.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 22.30%
TYG
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -11.67%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- 19.47%
- 10Y*
- -1.19%
CSTM vs. TYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTM Constellium SE | 90.24% | 83.54% | -48.55% | 68.72% | -33.95% | 28.02% | 4.40% | 91.70% | -37.31% | 88.98% |
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 12.81% | 8.46% | 60.18% | -0.37% | 24.20% | 46.86% | -70.31% | 1.79% | -24.74% | 3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSTM and TYG is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2013 | 0.34 |
The correlation between CSTM and TYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSTM vs. TYG — Risk / Return Rank
CSTM
TYG
CSTM vs. TYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellium SE (CSTM) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSTM | TYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.19 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.53 | 1.62 | +9.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.39 | 5.20 | +32.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSTM | TYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04 | 0.97 | +3.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.81 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | -0.02 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.09 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
CSTM vs. TYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSTM drawdown since its inception was -88.70%, smaller than the maximum TYG drawdown of -95.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTM and TYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSTM | TYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.70% | -95.34% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -11.67% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.35% | -25.08% | -41.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.35% | -25.08% | -41.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.30% | -94.98% | +22.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -35.65% | +35.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.85% | -29.42% | -24.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 3.63% | +1.28% |
Volatility
CSTM vs. TYG - Volatility Comparison
Constellium SE (CSTM) has a higher volatility of 14.55% compared to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) at 7.20%. This indicates that CSTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSTM | TYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.55% | 7.20% | +7.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.47% | 17.34% | +17.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.59% | 19.45% | +26.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.68% | 24.06% | +22.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.43% | 51.16% | +5.27% |
Dividends
CSTM vs. TYG - Dividend Comparison
CSTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTM Constellium SE | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 12.95% | 11.25% | 7.96% | 9.87% | 8.94% | 5.27% | 10.85% | 14.61% | 13.17% | 9.01% | 8.54% | 13.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSTM and TYG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSTM has higher volatility (14.55%) compared to TYG (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTM dropped -88.70% vs TYG's -95.34%.
CSTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSTM and TYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer