CSTM vs. SHIP
CSTM (Constellium SE) and SHIP (Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.) are both stocks. CSTM operates in Aluminum (Basic Materials), while SHIP operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CSTM returned 22.30%/yr vs -42.57%/yr for SHIP. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSTM vs. SHIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSTM achieves a 90.24% return, which is significantly higher than SHIP's 71.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CSTM has outperformed SHIP with an annualized return of 22.30%, while SHIP has yielded a comparatively lower -42.57% annualized return.
CSTM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 16.28%
- YTD
- 90.24%
- 6M
- 99.44%
- 1Y
- 182.81%
- 3Y*
- 31.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 22.30%
SHIP
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 71.45%
- 6M
- 45.61%
- 1Y
- 150.59%
- 3Y*
- 60.94%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- -42.57%
CSTM vs. SHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTM Constellium SE | 90.24% | 83.54% | -48.55% | 68.72% | -33.95% | 28.02% | 4.40% | 91.70% | -37.31% | 88.98% |
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 71.45% | 38.48% | -3.81% | 61.04% | -36.53% | 70.83% | -93.89% | -92.71% | -51.66% | -9.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSTM and SHIP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2013 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
CSTM:
$3.79
SHIP:
$1.00
CSTM:
9.47
SHIP:
15.55
CSTM:
0.12
SHIP:
0.04
CSTM:
0.49
SHIP:
2.03
CSTM:
$7.84B
SHIP:
$158.10M
CSTM:
$447.08M
SHIP:
$62.63M
CSTM:
$612.70M
SHIP:
$78.01M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSTM vs. SHIP — Risk / Return Rank
CSTM
SHIP
CSTM vs. SHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellium SE (CSTM) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSTM | SHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.50 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.53 | 8.16 | +3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.39 | 20.24 | +17.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSTM | SHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04 | 3.57 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.31 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | -0.43 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.10 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
CSTM vs. SHIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSTM drawdown since its inception was -88.70%, smaller than the maximum SHIP drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTM and SHIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSTM | SHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.70% | -100.00% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -18.56% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.35% | -57.61% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.35% | -69.11% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.30% | -99.98% | +27.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -99.98% | +99.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.85% | -86.56% | +32.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 7.47% | -2.56% |
Volatility
CSTM vs. SHIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Constellium SE (CSTM) is 14.55%, while Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) has a volatility of 18.56%. This indicates that CSTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSTM | SHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.55% | 18.56% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.47% | 33.99% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.59% | 42.49% | +3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.68% | 52.10% | -5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.43% | 98.58% | -42.15% |
Dividends
CSTM vs. SHIP - Dividend Comparison
CSTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTM Constellium SE | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 2.76% | 3.58% | 10.58% | 1.28% | 25.23% |
Financials
CSTM vs. SHIP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellium SE and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSTM vs. SHIP - Profitability Comparison
CSTM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SHIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 25.59M and revenue of 49.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
CSTM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SHIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 18.53M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.
CSTM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported a net income of 196.00M and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
SHIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 12.31M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSTM and SHIP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHIP has higher volatility (18.56%) compared to CSTM (14.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTM dropped -88.70% vs SHIP's -100.00%.
CSTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 3.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSTM and SHIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer