PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSTM vs. SHIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSTM vs. SHIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellium SE (CSTM) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSTM achieves a 52.84% return, which is significantly lower than SHIP's 65.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CSTM has outperformed SHIP with an annualized return of 18.90%, while SHIP has yielded a comparatively lower -42.18% annualized return.


CSTM

1D
-1.61%
1M
-19.07%
6M
31.61%
YTD
52.84%
1Y
104.18%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
18.90%

SHIP

1D
-1.14%
1M
-9.30%
6M
61.87%
YTD
65.20%
1Y
126.02%
3Y*
48.92%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*
-42.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSTM vs. SHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSTM
Constellium SE
52.84%83.54%-48.55%68.72%-33.95%28.02%4.40%91.70%-37.31%88.98%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
65.20%38.48%-3.81%61.04%-36.53%70.83%-93.89%-92.71%-51.66%-9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CSTM and SHIP is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSTM:

$3.92B

SHIP:

$312.28M

EPS

CSTM:

$4.26

SHIP:

$1.78

PE Ratio

CSTM:

6.76

SHIP:

8.30

PEG Ratio

CSTM:

0.08

SHIP:

0.02

PS Ratio

CSTM:

0.35

SHIP:

1.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSTM:

$7.84B

SHIP:

$176.75M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSTM:

$447.08M

SHIP:

$79.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

CSTM:

$612.70M

SHIP:

$96.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSTM vs. SHIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSTM
CSTM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CSTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSTM vs. SHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellium SE (CSTM) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSTMSHIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

6.71

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.32

15.33

+1.99

CSTM vs. SHIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the SHIP Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSTM and SHIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSTM vs. SHIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSTM drawdown since its inception was -88.70%, smaller than the maximum SHIP drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTM and SHIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSTMSHIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.70%

-100.00%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.30%

-18.88%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.35%

-57.61%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.35%

-69.11%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.30%

-99.98%

+27.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.30%

-99.98%

+79.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.49%

-86.61%

+33.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

8.25%

-2.21%

Volatility

CSTM vs. SHIP - Volatility Comparison

Constellium SE (CSTM) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) have volatilities of 13.42% and 13.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSTMSHIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.42%

13.85%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.62%

35.59%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.93%

43.36%

+3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.83%

51.47%

-4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.17%

98.59%

-42.42%

Dividends

CSTM vs. SHIP - Dividend Comparison

CSTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CSTM
Constellium SE
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
3.92%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%

Financials

CSTM vs. SHIP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellium SE and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.46B
42.85M
(CSTM) Total Revenue
(SHIP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSTM vs. SHIP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Constellium SE and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
45.0%
Portfolio components
CSTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Constellium SE reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SHIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 19.29M and revenue of 42.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

CSTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Constellium SE reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SHIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 11.75M and revenue of 42.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.

CSTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Constellium SE reported a net income of 196.00M and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

SHIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 9.50M and revenue of 42.85M, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSTM and SHIP have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHIP has higher volatility (13.85%) compared to CSTM (13.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTM dropped -88.70% vs SHIP's -100.00%.

SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSTM and SHIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer