PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSTM vs. CENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSTM vs. CENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellium SE (CSTM) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSTM achieves a 76.50% return, which is significantly higher than CENX's 20.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSTM having a 22.12% annualized return and CENX not far ahead at 22.40%.


CSTM

1D
-3.84%
1M
0.09%
YTD
76.50%
6M
73.55%
1Y
155.14%
3Y*
27.40%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
22.12%

CENX

1D
-4.44%
1M
-27.24%
YTD
20.80%
6M
21.45%
1Y
175.49%
3Y*
75.34%
5Y*
29.99%
10Y*
22.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSTM vs. CENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSTM
Constellium SE
76.50%83.54%-48.55%68.72%-33.95%28.02%4.40%91.70%-37.31%88.98%
CENX
Century Aluminum Company
20.80%115.04%50.08%48.41%-50.60%50.14%46.77%2.80%-62.78%129.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CSTM and CENX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.47

The correlation between CSTM and CENX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

CSTM:

$3.79

CENX:

$3.54

PE Ratio

CSTM:

8.78

CENX:

13.37

PEG Ratio

CSTM:

0.11

CENX:

0.04

PS Ratio

CSTM:

0.45

CENX:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSTM:

$7.84B

CENX:

$2.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSTM:

$447.08M

CENX:

$322.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

CSTM:

$612.70M

CENX:

$466.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSTM vs. CENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSTM
CSTM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CSTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CENX
CENX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CENX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CENX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSTM vs. CENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellium SE (CSTM) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSTMCENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.78

5.66

+4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.40

19.66

+11.74

CSTM vs. CENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSTM Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is comparable to the CENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSTM and CENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSTM vs. CENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSTM drawdown since its inception was -88.70%, smaller than the maximum CENX drawdown of -98.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTM and CENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSTMCENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.70%

-98.67%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-31.18%

+15.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.35%

-42.77%

-23.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.35%

-82.10%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.30%

-87.51%

+15.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.97%

-40.83%

+32.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.64%

-61.09%

+7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

8.96%

-4.00%

Volatility

CSTM vs. CENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Constellium SE (CSTM) is 15.06%, while Century Aluminum Company (CENX) has a volatility of 22.48%. This indicates that CSTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSTMCENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.06%

22.48%

-7.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.50%

47.80%

-12.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.35%

64.00%

-17.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.74%

72.22%

-25.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.27%

70.65%

-14.38%

Dividends

CSTM vs. CENX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSTM nor CENX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CSTM vs. CENX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellium SE and Century Aluminum Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.46B
649.20M
(CSTM) Total Revenue
(CENX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSTM vs. CENX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Constellium SE and Century Aluminum Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%202220232024202520260
18.3%
Portfolio components
CSTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CENX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Century Aluminum Company reported a gross profit of 118.80M and revenue of 649.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.3%.

CSTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CENX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Century Aluminum Company reported an operating income of 374.00M and revenue of 649.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.

CSTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported a net income of 196.00M and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

CENX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Century Aluminum Company reported a net income of 337.50M and revenue of 649.20M, resulting in a net margin of 52.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSTM and CENX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CENX has higher volatility (22.48%) compared to CSTM (15.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTM dropped -88.70% vs CENX's -98.67%.

CSTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSTM and CENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer