PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSTM vs. CENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSTM vs. CENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellium SE (CSTM) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSTM achieves a 47.37% return, which is significantly higher than CENX's 14.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CSTM has underperformed CENX with an annualized return of 18.52%, while CENX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.79% annualized return.


CSTM

1D
-2.77%
1M
-5.80%
6M
23.63%
YTD
47.37%
1Y
110.14%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
18.52%
ALL TIME*
5.62%

CENX

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.31%
6M
-1.24%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
118.71%
3Y*
69.21%
5Y*
25.19%
10Y*
20.79%
ALL TIME*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$78.09M$78.34M$110.32M
$55.17M$50.63M$64.86M

CSTM vs. CENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSTM
Constellium SE
47.37%83.54%-48.55%68.72%-33.95%28.02%4.40%91.70%-37.31%88.98%
CENX
Century Aluminum Company
14.27%115.04%50.08%48.41%-50.60%50.14%46.77%2.80%-62.78%129.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CSTM and CENX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.47

The correlation between CSTM and CENX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSTM:

$3.76B

CENX:

$4.43B

EPS

CSTM:

$5.20

CENX:

$3.48

PE Ratio

CSTM:

5.34

CENX:

12.88

PEG Ratio

CSTM:

0.07

CENX:

0.04

PS Ratio

CSTM:

0.31

CENX:

1.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSTM:

$9.58B

CENX:

$2.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSTM:

$911.00M

CENX:

$322.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

CSTM:

$870.00M

CENX:

$466.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSTM vs. CENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSTM
CSTM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CSTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CENX
CENX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CENX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSTM vs. CENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellium SE (CSTM) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSTMCENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

2.82

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.69

7.73

+5.96

CSTM vs. CENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the CENX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSTM and CENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSTM vs. CENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSTM drawdown since its inception was -88.70%, smaller than the maximum CENX drawdown of -98.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTM and CENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSTMCENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.70%

-98.67%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.57%

-39.65%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.35%

-42.77%

-23.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.35%

-82.10%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.30%

-87.51%

+15.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.15%

-44.03%

+20.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.35%

-61.03%

+7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

14.47%

-6.93%

Volatility

CSTM vs. CENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Constellium SE (CSTM) is 10.49%, while Century Aluminum Company (CENX) has a volatility of 13.92%. This indicates that CSTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSTMCENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

13.92%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.80%

47.32%

-10.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.13%

64.30%

-17.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.72%

71.84%

-25.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.13%

70.39%

-14.26%

Dividends

CSTM vs. CENX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSTM nor CENX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CSTM vs. CENX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellium SE and Century Aluminum Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CSTM vs. CENX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Constellium SE and Century Aluminum Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CSTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellium SE reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CENX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Century Aluminum Company reported a gross profit of 118.80M and revenue of 649.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.3%.

CSTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellium SE reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CENX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Century Aluminum Company reported an operating income of 374.00M and revenue of 649.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.

CSTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellium SE reported a net income of 148.00M and revenue of 2.75B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

CENX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Century Aluminum Company reported a net income of 337.50M and revenue of 649.20M, resulting in a net margin of 52.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSTM and CENX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CENX has higher volatility (13.92%) compared to CSTM (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTM dropped -88.70% vs CENX's -98.67%.

CSTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSTM and CENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer