PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSTM vs. AA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSTM vs. AA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellium SE (CSTM) and Alcoa Corporation (AA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSTM achieves a 90.24% return, which is significantly higher than AA's 52.66% return.


CSTM

1D
-0.58%
1M
16.28%
YTD
90.24%
6M
99.44%
1Y
182.81%
3Y*
31.03%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*
22.30%

AA

1D
-3.50%
1M
29.67%
YTD
52.66%
6M
83.95%
1Y
195.08%
3Y*
33.82%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSTM vs. AA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSTM
Constellium SE
90.24%83.54%-48.55%68.72%-33.95%28.02%4.40%91.70%-37.31%88.98%
AA
Alcoa Corporation
52.66%42.46%12.43%-24.33%-23.12%159.05%7.16%-19.07%-50.66%91.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CSTM and AA is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016

0.53

The correlation between CSTM and AA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

CSTM:

$3.79

AA:

$3.92

PE Ratio

CSTM:

9.47

AA:

20.63

PEG Ratio

CSTM:

0.12

AA:

0.06

PS Ratio

CSTM:

0.49

AA:

1.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSTM:

$7.84B

AA:

$12.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSTM:

$447.08M

AA:

$948.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

CSTM:

$612.70M

AA:

$1.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSTM vs. AA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSTM
CSTM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CSTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AA
AA Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSTM vs. AA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellium SE (CSTM) and Alcoa Corporation (AA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSTMAADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.04

3.74

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.41

3.92

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.47

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.53

12.43

-0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

37.39

30.82

+6.57

CSTM vs. AA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSTM Sharpe Ratio is 4.04, which is comparable to the AA Sharpe Ratio of 3.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSTM and AA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSTMAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04

3.74

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.30

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.26

-0.14

Drawdowns

CSTM vs. AA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSTM drawdown since its inception was -88.70%, roughly equal to the maximum AA drawdown of -90.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTM and AA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSTMAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.70%

-90.90%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-15.80%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.35%

-52.25%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.35%

-75.46%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-10.95%

+10.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.85%

-46.21%

-7.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

6.36%

-1.45%

Volatility

CSTM vs. AA - Volatility Comparison

Constellium SE (CSTM) and Alcoa Corporation (AA) have volatilities of 14.55% and 15.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSTMAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.55%

15.13%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.47%

38.86%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.59%

52.62%

-7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.68%

55.96%

-9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.43%

55.55%

+0.88%

Dividends

CSTM vs. AA - Dividend Comparison

CSTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AA
Alcoa Corporation
0.49%0.75%1.06%1.18%0.88%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.32%
CSTM
Constellium SE
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CSTM vs. AA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellium SE and Alcoa Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
2.46B
3.19B
(CSTM) Total Revenue
(AA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSTM vs. AA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Constellium SE and Alcoa Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
CSTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CSTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CSTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported a net income of 196.00M and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

AA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a net income of 425.00M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSTM and AA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AA has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to CSTM (14.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTM dropped -88.70% vs AA's -90.90%.

CSTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 3.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSTM and AA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer