CSTM vs. AA
CSTM (Constellium SE) and AA (Alcoa Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aluminum industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 5 years, CSTM returned 14.93%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for AA. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CSTM vs. AA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSTM achieves a 90.24% return, which is significantly higher than AA's 52.66% return.
CSTM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 16.28%
- YTD
- 90.24%
- 6M
- 99.44%
- 1Y
- 182.81%
- 3Y*
- 31.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 22.30%
AA
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 29.67%
- YTD
- 52.66%
- 6M
- 83.95%
- 1Y
- 195.08%
- 3Y*
- 33.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- —
CSTM vs. AA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTM Constellium SE | 90.24% | 83.54% | -48.55% | 68.72% | -33.95% | 28.02% | 4.40% | 91.70% | -37.31% | 88.98% |
AA Alcoa Corporation | 52.66% | 42.46% | 12.43% | -24.33% | -23.12% | 159.05% | 7.16% | -19.07% | -50.66% | 91.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSTM and AA is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CSTM and AA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CSTM:
$3.79
AA:
$3.92
CSTM:
9.47
AA:
20.63
CSTM:
0.12
AA:
0.06
CSTM:
0.49
AA:
1.67
CSTM:
$7.84B
AA:
$12.66B
CSTM:
$447.08M
AA:
$948.00M
CSTM:
$612.70M
AA:
$1.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSTM vs. AA — Risk / Return Rank
CSTM
AA
CSTM vs. AA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellium SE (CSTM) and Alcoa Corporation (AA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSTM | AA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.47 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.53 | 12.43 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.39 | 30.82 | +6.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSTM | AA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04 | 3.74 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.30 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.26 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
CSTM vs. AA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSTM drawdown since its inception was -88.70%, roughly equal to the maximum AA drawdown of -90.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTM and AA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSTM | AA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.70% | -90.90% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -15.80% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.35% | -52.25% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.35% | -75.46% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -10.95% | +10.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.85% | -46.21% | -7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 6.36% | -1.45% |
Volatility
CSTM vs. AA - Volatility Comparison
Constellium SE (CSTM) and Alcoa Corporation (AA) have volatilities of 14.55% and 15.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSTM | AA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.55% | 15.13% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.47% | 38.86% | -4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.59% | 52.62% | -7.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.68% | 55.96% | -9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.43% | 55.55% | +0.88% |
Dividends
CSTM vs. AA - Dividend Comparison
CSTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA Alcoa Corporation | 0.49% | 0.75% | 1.06% | 1.18% | 0.88% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.32% |
CSTM Constellium SE | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CSTM vs. AA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellium SE and Alcoa Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSTM vs. AA - Profitability Comparison
CSTM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CSTM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
AA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CSTM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellium SE reported a net income of 196.00M and revenue of 2.46B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
AA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a net income of 425.00M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSTM and AA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AA has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to CSTM (14.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSTM dropped -88.70% vs AA's -90.90%.
CSTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 3.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSTM and AA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer