CSSD vs. QPFF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) and QPFF (American Century Quality Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. CSSD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for QPFF.

Performance

CSSD vs. QPFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CSSD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 2.48%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QPFF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSSD vs. QPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	1.32%
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

CSSD vs. QPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSSD	QPFF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.03	—	—

Drawdowns

CSSD vs. QPFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSSD drawdown since its inception was -2.32%, which is greater than QPFF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSD and QPFF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSSD	QPFF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	0.00%	-2.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	0.00%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	0.00%	-0.31%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSSD	QPFF	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.17%	0.00%	+3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.17%	0.00%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.17%	0.00%	+3.17%

CSSD vs. QPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSSD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QPFF's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSSD vs. QPFF - Dividend Comparison

CSSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, while QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	2.63%	0.53%
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CSSD or QPFF?

On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSSD or QPFF?

QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CSSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSSD or QPFF?

CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.

What is the main difference between CSSD and QPFF?

They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CSSD and 0.33% for QPFF.