CSSD vs. PFFR
CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) and PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. CSSD is actively managed, while PFFR is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSSD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFFR.
Performance
CSSD vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSD achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than PFFR's 2.66% return.
CSSD
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFFR
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 5.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- —
CSSD vs. PFFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.12% | 0.49% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 2.66% | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSD and PFFR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSD vs. PFFR — Risk / Return Rank
CSSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PFFR
CSSD vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSSD | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSSD vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSD drawdown since its inception was -2.32%, smaller than the maximum PFFR drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSD and PFFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSD | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -53.02% | +50.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -1.27% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -6.94% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility
CSSD vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSD | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 8.00% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.02% | 10.51% | -7.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.02% | 20.44% | -17.42% |
CSSD vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSD vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison
CSSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than PFFR's 8.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.14% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.21% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSD and PFFR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFFR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFFR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CSSD.
PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 3.14% for CSSD.
They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CSSD and 0.45% for PFFR.
Find the right allocation for CSSD and PFFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer