CSSD vs. LPXZX
CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) and LPXZX (Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds from Cohen & Steers. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSSD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LPXZX.
Performance
CSSD vs. LPXZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSD achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than LPXZX's 1.76% return.
CSSD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LPXZX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 5.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 4.24%
CSSD vs. LPXZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 2.48% | 0.51% |
LPXZX Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund | 1.76% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSD and LPXZX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSD vs. LPXZX — Risk / Return Rank
CSSD
LPXZX
CSSD vs. LPXZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSD | LPXZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.03 | 1.11 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
CSSD vs. LPXZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSD drawdown since its inception was -2.32%, smaller than the maximum LPXZX drawdown of -18.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSD and LPXZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSD | LPXZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -18.13% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.10% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -1.48% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.46% | — |
Volatility
CSSD vs. LPXZX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSD | LPXZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17% | 1.86% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 2.71% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 3.78% | -0.61% |
CSSD vs. LPXZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than LPXZX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSD vs. LPXZX - Dividend Comparison
CSSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than LPXZX's 5.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 2.63% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LPXZX Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund | 5.15% | 4.84% | 5.10% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 4.21% | 4.36% | 4.51% | 4.71% | 3.78% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSD and LPXZX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CSSD and LPXZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer