LPXZX vs. CSUAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LPXZX (Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - LPXZX is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSUAX is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, LPXZX returned 4.28%/yr vs 7.32%/yr for CSUAX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LPXZX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CSUAX.

Performance

LPXZX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPXZX achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, LPXZX has underperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 4.28%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.32% annualized return.

LPXZX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 5.70%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: 4.28%

CSUAX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 10.52%
• 1Y: 17.84%
• 3Y*: 10.99%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: 7.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPXZX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LPXZX Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund	2.08%	6.89%	8.75%	6.91%	-5.78%	2.08%	4.27%	11.38%	-1.44%	5.82%
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	9.88%	14.30%	8.30%	2.09%	-5.20%	16.24%	-1.65%	24.26%	-5.83%	17.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LPXZX and CSUAX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.31

Return for Risk

LPXZX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPXZX

LPXZX Risk / Return Rank: 82
LPXZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LPXZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
LPXZX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
LPXZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LPXZX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 51
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPXZX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LPXZX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	1.85	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.50	2.63	+1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.82	1.33	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	3.05	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	9.69	+2.89

LPXZX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPXZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPXZX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LPXZX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPXZX drawdown since its inception was -18.13%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPXZX and CSUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LPXZX	CSUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.13%	-52.20%	+34.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.14%	-5.99%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.14%	-14.95%	+12.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.69%	-20.45%	+10.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.13%	-35.05%	+16.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.03%	+3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.47%	-8.43%	+6.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	1.87%	-1.41%

Volatility

LPXZX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX) is 0.49%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that LPXZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LPXZX	CSUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.49%	3.40%	-2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.67%	7.99%	-6.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87%	9.86%	-7.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.71%	12.99%	-10.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.78%	14.92%	-11.14%

LPXZX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPXZX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

LPXZX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

LPXZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than CSUAX's 7.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.36%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%
LPXZX Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund	5.13%	4.84%	5.10%	4.92%	4.45%	4.21%	4.36%	4.51%	4.71%	3.78%	4.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LPXZX and CSUAX in my portfolio?

LPXZX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LPXZX or CSUAX?

CSUAX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to LPXZX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPXZX dropped -18.13% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LPXZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.