CSSD vs. CSEN
CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) and CSEN (Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSSD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSEN is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. CSSD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CSEN.
Performance
CSSD vs. CSEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CSSD
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSEN
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSSD vs. CSEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 0.45% |
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF | -2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSD and CSEN is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSD vs. CSEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD) and Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSSD vs. CSEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSD drawdown since its inception was -2.32%, smaller than the maximum CSEN drawdown of -5.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSD and CSEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSD | CSEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -5.10% | +2.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -2.35% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -2.69% | +2.41% |
Volatility
CSSD vs. CSEN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSD | CSEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03% | 15.07% | -12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.03% | 15.07% | -12.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.03% | 15.07% | -12.04% |
CSSD vs. CSEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CSEN's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSD vs. CSEN - Dividend Comparison
CSSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than CSEN's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF | 0.33% | 0.00% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.15% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSD and CSEN have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CSEN.
CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.33% for CSEN.
CSSD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while CSEN is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CSSD and 0.80% for CSEN.
Find the right allocation for CSSD and CSEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer