PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSRE vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSRE vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSRE achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.


CSRE

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
9.87%
6M
8.55%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SRVR

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
19.79%
6M
20.69%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSRE vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CSRE and SRVR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.67

The correlation between CSRE and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSRE vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSRE
CSRE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CSRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSRE vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSRESRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

0.76

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

1.64

+2.53

CSRE vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRE and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSRESRVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.67

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.30

+0.35

Drawdowns

CSRE vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSRESRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-40.99%

+27.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-14.78%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-12.28%

+8.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-15.27%

+12.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

6.83%

-4.22%

Volatility

CSRE vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) is 3.56%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that CSRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSRESRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

5.47%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

13.12%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

16.72%

-3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

19.71%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

21.44%

-5.99%

CSRE vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSRE vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than SRVR's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CSRE
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF
2.30%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.70%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSRE and SRVR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to CSRE (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRE dropped -13.03% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 1-year performance, SRVR leads with 11.19% vs 10.86% for CSRE. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CSRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SRVR has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CSRE.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 2.30% for CSRE.

They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 0.60% for SRVR.

CSRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSRE and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer