CSPF vs. FPFD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CSPF (Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF) and FPFD (Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSPF returned 8.49% vs 5.55% for FPFD. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

CSPF vs. FPFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) and Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPF achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly higher than FPFD's 0.75% return.

CSPF

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 3.08%
• 6M: 3.04%
• 1Y: 8.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FPFD

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: 7.78%
• 5Y*: 1.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPF vs. FPFD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF	3.08%	8.22%
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF	0.75%	5.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPF and FPFD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.51

The correlation between CSPF and FPFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSPF vs. FPFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSPF

CSPF Risk / Return Rank: 67
CSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
CSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FPFD

FPFD Risk / Return Rank: 53
FPFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FPFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FPFD Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FPFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FPFD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPF vs. FPFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) and Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSPF	FPFD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.87	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.77	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.36	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	2.03	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.63	7.16	+5.47

CSPF vs. FPFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPF Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the FPFD Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPF and FPFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSPF vs. FPFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPF drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum FPFD drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPF and FPFD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSPF	FPFD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-20.83%	+17.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-2.75%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-1.20%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-6.76%	+6.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.78%	-0.11%

Volatility

CSPF vs. FPFD - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) at 0.74%. This indicates that CSPF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSPF	FPFD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	0.74%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.15%	2.28%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	2.99%	+1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.18%	5.31%	-1.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.18%	5.30%	-1.12%

CSPF vs. FPFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CSPF and FPFD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

CSPF vs. FPFD - Dividend Comparison

CSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, which matches FPFD's 5.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF	5.14%	4.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF	5.15%	5.04%	4.89%	5.09%	5.22%	1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSPF and FPFD in my portfolio?

CSPF and FPFD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSPF or FPFD?

CSPF has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to FPFD (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSPF dropped -3.06% vs FPFD's -20.83%.

Which ETF is better, CSPF or FPFD?

On 1-year performance, CSPF leads with 8.49% vs 5.55% for FPFD. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSPF or FPFD?

Over the 1-year period, CSPF has performed better with a 8.49% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSPF or FPFD?

CSPF and FPFD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSPF or FPFD?

CSPF and FPFD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 5.14%.

What is the main difference between CSPF and FPFD?

They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Fidelity.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.