CSNDX.MI vs. IWFG
CSNDX.MI (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWFG (NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNDX.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while IWFG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by New York Life. CSNDX.MI is passively managed, while IWFG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSNDX.MI returned 24.49%/yr vs 19.95%/yr for IWFG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSNDX.MI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IWFG.
Performance
CSNDX.MI vs. IWFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSNDX.MI is traded in EUR, while IWFG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWFG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNDX.MI achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than IWFG's 3.74% return.
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
IWFG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSNDX.MI vs. IWFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 20.42% | 6.74% | 35.09% | 50.07% | -8.15% |
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 3.74% | 0.76% | 46.64% | 34.25% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and IWFG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and IWFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSNDX.MI vs. IWFG — Risk / Return Rank
CSNDX.MI
IWFG
CSNDX.MI vs. IWFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) and NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSNDX.MI | IWFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.11 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 0.51 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 1.34 | +9.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSNDX.MI | IWFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 0.59 | +1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.02 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
CSNDX.MI vs. IWFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, which is greater than IWFG's maximum drawdown of -27.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNDX.MI and IWFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSNDX.MI | IWFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -27.18% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -19.22% | +9.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.71% | -27.18% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -2.41% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -5.32% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 7.35% | -3.98% |
Volatility
CSNDX.MI vs. IWFG - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) at 3.35%. This indicates that CSNDX.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSNDX.MI | IWFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 3.35% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 12.09% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 16.78% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 20.44% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 20.44% | -0.83% |
CSNDX.MI vs. IWFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNDX.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFG's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSNDX.MI vs. IWFG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSNDX.MI nor IWFG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWFG NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.44% | 1.01% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSNDX.MI and IWFG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSNDX.MI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSNDX.MI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IWFG.
CSNDX.MI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IWFG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CSNDX.MI and 0.46% for IWFG.
Find the right allocation for CSNDX.MI and IWFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer