CSNDX.MI vs. CNDX.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS).
CSNDX.MI and CNDX.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSNDX.MI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. CNDX.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both CSNDX.MI and CNDX.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSNDX.MI or CNDX.AS.
Correlation
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and CNDX.AS is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CSNDX.MI vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CSNDX.MI:
1.76
CNDX.AS:
1.59
CSNDX.MI:
2.35
CNDX.AS:
2.12
CSNDX.MI:
1.33
CNDX.AS:
1.29
CSNDX.MI:
2.28
CNDX.AS:
2.00
CSNDX.MI:
7.52
CNDX.AS:
6.65
CSNDX.MI:
4.07%
CNDX.AS:
4.09%
CSNDX.MI:
17.35%
CNDX.AS:
17.22%
CSNDX.MI:
-31.19%
CNDX.AS:
-31.21%
CSNDX.MI:
-1.31%
CNDX.AS:
-1.31%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSNDX.MI having a 2.79% return and CNDX.AS slightly lower at 2.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSNDX.MI having a 18.72% annualized return and CNDX.AS not far behind at 18.58%.
CSNDX.MI
2.79%
1.66%
18.45%
30.61%
19.29%
18.72%
CNDX.AS
2.74%
1.85%
18.49%
30.69%
19.17%
18.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSNDX.MI vs. CNDX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNDX.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.AS's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSNDX.MI vs. CNDX.AS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CSNDX.MI
CNDX.AS
CSNDX.MI vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSNDX.MI vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSNDX.MI nor CNDX.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CSNDX.MI vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, roughly equal to the maximum CNDX.AS drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNDX.MI and CNDX.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSNDX.MI vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) at 5.17%. This indicates that CSNDX.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.